Pint Sized Paradise
Data last updated · May 2026
Quality Indicators
See Methodology →- Overall QualityCombines daily care quality (interactions, learning, environment) with structural features like staff-to-child ratios and teacher qualifications.4 / 5
- Process QualityThe quality of daily care — caregiver-child interactions, learning activities, and the emotional climate. Drawn from the state QRIS rating, accreditations, and Head Start CLASS observations.Not Available
- Structural QualityMeasurable features like staff-to-child ratios, group sizes, license status, and teacher qualifications. Provider-level data when available; otherwise the state regulatory baseline.4 / 5
Why this rating
This daycare earned 4 out of 5 stars overall. Structural quality reflects Utah's licensing baseline. Utah caps infant ratios at 1:4, toddler ratios at 1:5, and preschool ratios at 1:15. Lead-teacher education isn't regulated. Teachers must complete 20 hours of annual training. No objective process measures (e.g., state quality rating or national accreditation) are available for this daycare. The overall rating reflects structural features only.
Quality Recognitions & Accreditations
- State Quality Rating
- Child Care Quality System Default Foundation of Quality Learn more →
- Accreditations
- National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)Not Accredited
- National Accreditation Commission (NAC)Not Accredited
- National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA)Not Accredited
- National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)Not Accredited
Facility Info
- Facility type
- Daycare
- Age groups served
- Toddlers
- Licensed capacity
- Not Available
- Teacher-child ratios & group sizesState Minimum Displayed
Age Max ratio Max group Toddlers 1:5 10
Teacher Credentials
- Lead teacher credentialState Minimum Displayed
- Not Regulated
Inspection History
Across 3 inspections since 2024, the issues cited most often were Children's Records & Files (2), Staff Qualifications & Background Checks (1), and Food Safety & Allergic Reactions (1). None of the 5 findings were critical.
See All 3 Inspection Visits
Dec 2, 20251 Finding1 Important
- The Provider Was Out of Compliance with Rule R381-100-11(1)(a) by Not Ensuring That Caregivers Provided and Maintained…R381-100-11(1)(a)-(g)
The provider was out of compliance with Rule R381-100-11(1)(a) by not ensuring that caregivers provided and maintained active supervision of each child, including for children younger than five years old, a caregiver was physically present in the room or area with the children. When the licensor arr
May 22, 20252 Findings2 Important
- The Provider Was Out of Compliance with Rule R381-100-13(4) by Not Ensuring That Choking Hazards Were Inaccessible To…R381-100-13(4)
The provider was out of compliance with Rule R381-100-13(4) by not ensuring that choking hazards were inaccessible to children younger than three years old. On the playground, there were broken pieces of plastic on the ground, accessible to children younger than three years old. This was a repeat ru
- The Provider Was Out of Compliance with Rule R381-100-24(20) by Not Ensuring That Loose Blankets Were Not in The…R381-100-24(20)
The provider was out of compliance with Rule R381-100-24(20) by not ensuring that loose blankets were not in the sleeping equipment with a sleeping infant. In the infant/toddler room, there was a loose blanket on a sleeping infant in the sleep equipment. This was a repeat rule noncompliance as noted
Oct 28, 20242 Findings2 Important
- The Provider Was Out of Compliance with This Rule by Not Ensuring That the Parent Completed an Admission Agreement Form…R381-100-6(10)
The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring that the parent completed an admission agreement form for their child before the child was admitted into the child care program. At the facility, there was a child in care whose parent had not completed an admission agreement form bef
- The Provider Was Out of Compliance with This Rule by Not Ensuring That the Admission and Health Assessment Form Was…R381-100-6(12)(a)-(b)
The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring that the admission and health assessment form was reviewed, updated, and signed or initialed by the parent at least annually. At the facility, there were admission and health assessment forms for two children that had not been reviewe