Play 2 Learn Academy on Main Street
Data last updated · May 2026
Quality Indicators
See Methodology →- Overall QualityCombines daily care quality (interactions, learning, environment) with structural features like staff-to-child ratios and teacher qualifications.4 / 5
- Process QualityThe quality of daily care — caregiver-child interactions, learning activities, and the emotional climate. Drawn from the state QRIS rating, accreditations, and Head Start CLASS observations.Not Available
- Structural QualityMeasurable features like staff-to-child ratios, group sizes, license status, and teacher qualifications. Provider-level data when available; otherwise the state regulatory baseline.4 / 5
Why this rating
This daycare earned 4 out of 5 stars overall. Structural quality reflects Utah's licensing baseline. Utah caps infant ratios at 1:4, toddler ratios at 1:5, and preschool ratios at 1:15. Lead-teacher education isn't regulated. Teachers must complete 20 hours of annual training. No objective process measures (e.g., state quality rating or national accreditation) are available for this daycare. The overall rating reflects structural features only.
Quality Recognitions & Accreditations
- State Quality Rating
- Child Care Quality System Certified High Quality Learn more →
- Accreditations
- National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)Not Accredited
- National Accreditation Commission (NAC)Not Accredited
- National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA)Not Accredited
- National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)Not Accredited
Facility Info
- Facility type
- Daycare
- Age groups served
- Infants, Toddlers, School-Age
- Licensed capacity
- Not Available
- Teacher-child ratios & group sizesState Minimum Displayed
Age Max ratio Max group Infants 1:4 8 Toddlers 1:5 10
Teacher Credentials
- Lead teacher credentialState Minimum Displayed
- Not Regulated
Inspection History
Across 2 inspections since 2023, the issues cited most often were Hazardous Materials Handling (3) and Food Safety & Allergic Reactions (1). Of 4 total findings, 1 was critical.
See All 2 Inspection Visits
Nov 27, 20242 Findings2 Important
- The Provider Was Out of Compliance with This Rule by Not Ensuring That Hazardous Chemicals Were Inaccessible To…R381-100-13(9)(a)-(d)
The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring that hazardous chemicals were inaccessible to children and labeled with the contents of the containers. In the hallway closet, there was a bottle of cleanser and water that had not been labeled with the contents of the container. In
- The Provider Was Out of Compliance with This Rule by Not Ensuring That Breast Milk Brought From Home for an Individual…R381-100-24(13)(a)-(d)
The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring that breast milk brought from home for an individual child's use was labeled with the child's name, the date, and the time that it had been prepared. In the infant room, there were breast milk bottles for one infant that had not been
Oct 10, 20232 Findings1 Critical1 Important
- The Provider Was Out of Compliance with This Rule by Having Toxic or Hazardous Chemicals Accessible to ChildrenR381-100-13(9)(a)-(d)
The provider was out of compliance with this rule by having toxic or hazardous chemicals accessible to children. In the Koala Room, there was a dispenser of dish soap on the sink. In the Zebra Room, there was a bottle of cleaner on a shelf accessible to children. This was a repeat rule noncompliance
- The Provider Was Out of Compliance with This Rule by Having Empty Plastic Bags Large Enough for a Child's Head to Fit…R381-100-13(7)
The provider was out of compliance with this rule by having empty plastic bags large enough for a child's head to fit inside accessible to children younger than 5 years of age. In the Zebra Room, there was a box of empty plastic bags on a shelf accessible to children. This was a repeat rule noncompl