Quality Interactive Anthem Montessori
Data last updated · May 2026
Quality Indicators
See Methodology →- Overall QualityCombines daily care quality (interactions, learning, environment) with structural features like staff-to-child ratios and teacher qualifications.4 / 5
- Process QualityThe quality of daily care — caregiver-child interactions, learning activities, and the emotional climate. Drawn from the state QRIS rating, accreditations, and Head Start CLASS observations.4 / 5
- Structural QualityMeasurable features like staff-to-child ratios, group sizes, license status, and teacher qualifications. Provider-level data when available; otherwise the state regulatory baseline.5 / 5
Why this rating
This daycare earned 4 out of 5 stars overall. Process quality reflects a Quality First rating of Level 4 (out of 5). Structural quality reflects a license in good standing. The structural rating also includes Arizona's licensing baseline — what every licensed daycare in the state must meet. Arizona caps infant ratios at 1:5, toddler ratios at 1:6, and preschool ratios at 1:15. Lead teachers must hold a High School Diploma. Teachers must complete 18 hours of annual training.
Quality Recognitions & Accreditations
- State Quality Rating
- Quality First Level 4 (Max 5) Learn more →
- Accreditations
- National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)Not Accredited
- National Accreditation Commission (NAC)Not Accredited
- National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA)Not Accredited
- National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)Not Accredited
Facility Info
- Facility type
- Child Care Center
- Age groups served
- Infants, Toddlers, Preschool
- Licensed capacity
- 225
- Teacher-child ratios & group sizesState Minimum Displayed
Age Max ratio Max group Infants 1:5 Not Regulated Toddlers 1:6 Not Regulated Preschool 1:15 Not Regulated
Teacher Credentials
- Lead teacher credentialState Minimum Displayed
- High School Diploma
Inspection History
Across 8 inspections since 2023, the issues cited most often were Licensing & Administrative Compliance (6), Staff-to-Child Ratios & Group Size (1), and Staff Qualifications & Background Checks (1). None of the 8 findings were critical.
See All 8 Inspection Visits
Nov 5, 20251 Finding1 Important
- The Purpose of the Inspection Was to Conduct the Compliance Inspection and Complaint #00147270 and Complaint #00148580…Complaint Compliance (Annual)
The purpose of the inspection was to conduct the Compliance inspection and Complaint #00147270 and Complaint #00148580 investigation on 11/5/25. The following deficiencies are subject to changes pending programmatic review. Please submit the Plan of Corrections via the LMS portal within 10 days of receiving the Statement of Deficiencies. Ratios observed were: Infants: 2:6 1's-2's: 4:24 3's-5's: 3:30 There were 4 staff members interviewed during this investigation. Facility docu
May 9, 20251 Finding1 Important
- The Purpose of the Inspection Was to Investigate Complaint #00129667 on 5/9/2025Complaint
The purpose of the inspection was to investigate complaint #00129667 on 5/9/2025. A full inspection was not conducted at this time. The ratios observed were: Infants: 2:6 1's-2's: 2:12 1's-3's: 2:7 3's-5's: 2:15 3's-6's: 3:21 Complainant was contacted on 5/8/25. Four staff members were interviewed during this investigation. Documentation reviewed included the following: Communication records, injury/illness log There were no deficiencies found at the time of the complaint #00
Apr 4, 20251 Finding1 Important
- The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of Complaint Investigation #00124418 Conducted on April 4, 2025,…Complaint
The following deficiencies were observed at the time of Complaint investigation #00124418 conducted on April 4, 2025, and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. A full inspection was not conducted at this time. The ratios observed were: Infants 2:7 1's: 1:12; 2:6 2/3/4/5s: 2:24 3's: 2:13 There were 3 staff members interviewed during this investigation. The complainant was contacted on 4/8/25. Upon completion of the complaint investigation, it was determined from obser
Nov 7, 20241 Finding1 Important
- The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of the Compliance Inspection Conducted on 11/8/25 and Are Subject…Compliance (Annual)
The following deficiencies were observed at the time of the compliance inspection conducted on 11/8/25 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. Compliance Officer # 1: Brian Howell Compliance Officer # 2: Archana Navin 4 of 4 Fingerprint clearance cards reviewed were valid via a DPS website search. The Written Document of Corrections is due within 10 days
May 24, 20241 Finding1 Important
- The Following Deficiency Was Observed at the Time of Complaint #00084277 Investigation Conducted on 5/24/24 and Are…Complaint
The following deficiency was observed at the time of Complaint #00084277 investigation conducted on 5/24/24 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. A telephone call was made to the Complainant on 5/24/24. Compliance Officer # 1: Brian Howell Compliance Officer # 2: Archana Navin The Written Document of Corrections is due within 10 days A complete inspection of the facility was not conducted. The following classroom ratios were observed: Infants: 2:5 Ones/Twos:
May 10, 20241 Finding1 Important
- The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of Complaint 00084052 Investigation Conducted on 5/10/24 and Are…Complaint
The following deficiencies were observed at the time of Complaint 00084052 investigation conducted on 5/10/24 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. Compliance Officer # 1: Brian Howell Compliance Officer # 2: Archana Navin The Written Document of Corrections is not due at this time. A complete inspection of the facility was not conducted. The following classroom ratios were observed: Infants:1:5 Ones/Twos: 4:14 Ones/Twos: 2:8 Threes/Fours: 4:21 Six staff me
Jan 5, 20241 Finding1 Important
- The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of the Initial Monitoring Inspection Conducted on 1/5/24 and Are…Initial Monitoring
The following deficiencies were observed at the time of the initial monitoring inspection conducted on 1/5/24 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. Compliance Officer # 1: Brian Howell Compliance Officer # 2: Archana Navin 4 of 4 Fingerprint clearance cards reviewed were valid via a DPS website search. The Written Document of Corrections is due within 10 days
Nov 8, 20231 Finding1 Important
- The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of the Initial Compliance Inspection Conducted on 11/8/23 and Are…Compliance (Initial)
The following deficiencies were observed at the time of the initial compliance inspection conducted on 11/8/23 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. Compliance Officer (CO): Brian Howell Compliance Officer Supervisor (COS): Peggy Kraus 6 of 6 fingerprint clearance cards reviewed were valid via a DPS website search. The Written Documentation of Corrections is due within 10 days.