Rabia Ali
Data last updated · May 2026
Quality Indicators
See Methodology →- Overall QualityCombines daily care quality (interactions, learning, environment) with structural features like staff-to-child ratios and teacher qualifications.3 / 5
- Process QualityThe quality of daily care — caregiver-child interactions, learning activities, and the emotional climate. Drawn from the state QRIS rating, accreditations, and Head Start CLASS observations.2 / 5
- Structural QualityMeasurable features like staff-to-child ratios, group sizes, license status, and teacher qualifications. Provider-level data when available; otherwise the state regulatory baseline.5 / 5
Why this rating
This daycare earned 3 out of 5 stars overall. Process quality reflects a Maryland EXCELS rating of Level 1 (out of 5). Structural quality reflects a license in good standing. The structural rating also includes Maryland's licensing baseline — what every licensed daycare in the state must meet. Maryland caps infant ratios at 1:3, toddler ratios at 1:3, and preschool ratios at 1:10. Lead teachers must hold a High School Diploma. Teachers must complete 12 hours of annual training.
Quality Recognitions & Accreditations
- State Quality Rating
- Maryland EXCELS Level 1 (Max 5) Learn more →
- Accreditations
- National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)Not Accredited
- National Accreditation Commission (NAC)Not Accredited
- National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA)Not Accredited
- National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)Not Accredited
Facility Info
- Facility type
- Family Child Care Home
- Age groups served
- Toddlers, Preschool, School-Age
- Licensed capacity
- 7
- Teacher-child ratios & group sizesState Minimum Displayed
Age Max ratio Max group Toddlers 1:3 9 Preschool 1:10 20
Teacher Credentials
- Lead teacher credentialState Minimum Displayed
- High School Diploma
Inspection History
Across 2 inspections since 2023, the issues cited most often were First Aid & Pediatric CPR (2), Children's Records & Files (1), and Building & Premises Safety (1). None of the 5 findings were critical.
See All 2 Inspection Visits
Oct 1, 20252 Findings2 Important
- LS Observed No Evidence of One (1) Child's Lead Screening Information13A.15.03.02B
LS observed no evidence of one (1) child's lead screening information. Provider to submit a written statement verifying that the lead screening information has been obtained and is accessible in the child files.
- LS Observed No Evidence of Liquid Fragrance Free Soap in the First Aid Kit13A.15.10.01H(1)
LS observed no evidence of liquid fragrance free soap in the first aid kit. Provider to submit photographic evidence that liquid, fragrance free soap has been obtained and is accessible in the first aid kit.
Sep 15, 20233 Findings3 Important
- LS Observed Electrical Sockets That Were Not Plugged or Capped13A.15.05.04B(1)
LS observed electrical sockets that were not plugged or capped. Provider to submit photographic evidence that all sockets have been covered.
- LS Observed an Emergency Preparedness Plan That Had Not Been Updated Annually. Provider Reviewed and Updated at the Time of the Inspection.13A.15.10.01A(4)
- LS Observed the First Aid Kit That Was Missing Clear, Liquid, Fragrance Free Soap13A.15.10.01H(1)
LS observed the First Aid kit that was missing clear, liquid, fragrance free soap. provider to submit photographic evidence that the item has been placed in the First Aid kit.