Rainbow of Beautiful Babies
Data last updated · May 2026
Quality Indicators
See Methodology →- Overall QualityCombines daily care quality (interactions, learning, environment) with structural features like staff-to-child ratios and teacher qualifications.3 / 5
- Process QualityThe quality of daily care — caregiver-child interactions, learning activities, and the emotional climate. Drawn from the state QRIS rating, accreditations, and Head Start CLASS observations.3 / 5
- Structural QualityMeasurable features like staff-to-child ratios, group sizes, license status, and teacher qualifications. Provider-level data when available; otherwise the state regulatory baseline.5 / 5
Why this rating
This daycare earned 3 out of 5 stars overall. Process quality reflects a YoungStar rating of 2 Star. Structural quality reflects a license in good standing. The structural rating also includes Wisconsin's licensing baseline — what every licensed daycare in the state must meet. Wisconsin caps infant ratios at 1:4, toddler ratios at 1:4, and preschool ratios at 1:13. Lead teachers must hold a High School Diploma. Teachers must complete 15 hours of annual training.
Quality Recognitions & Accreditations
- State Quality Rating
- YoungStar 2 Star (Max 5) Learn more →
- Accreditations
- National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)Not Accredited
- National Accreditation Commission (NAC)Not Accredited
- National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA)Not Accredited
- National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)Not Accredited
Facility Info
- Facility type
- Family Child Care Home
- Age groups served
- Preschool
- Licensed capacity
- 8
- Teacher-child ratios & group sizesState Minimum Displayed
Age Max ratio Max group Preschool 1:13 26
Teacher Credentials
- Lead teacher credentialState Minimum Displayed
- High School Diploma
Inspection History
Across 3 inspections since 2024, the issues cited most often were Building & Premises Safety (5), Children's Records & Files (2), and Infectious Disease Prevention & Control (1). Of 12 total findings, 1 was critical.
See All 3 Inspection Visits
Feb 9, 20261 Finding1 Important
- Radon - Continuous Testing250.06(2)(n)5.
A radon test has not been conducted every 2 years as required. The most recent radon test report on file for the center
Jul 24, 20256 Findings1 Critical5 Important
- Access To Materials Potentially Harmful To Children250.06(2)(c)
There was a bottle of Purell hand sanitizer that was accessible to children; the label on the container states to keep o
- Child Record - Health History250.04(6)(a)1m.
The health history form for Child #2 was incomplete. None of the boxes were checked indicating if the child has a medica
- Biennial Training - Child Abuse & Neglect250.05(3)(fm)
The Child Abuse & Neglect training certificate on file for Staff B expired in February 2025.
- Outdoor Play Space - Enclosure250.06(11)(b)4.
There was an area of the fence that had a gap greater than 4 inches.
- Potential Source Of Harm On Premises250.06(2)(e)
There were several prickly weeds in the outdoor space that were accessible to children.
- Premises - Condition & Repair250.06(2)(m)
There was a hole in the wall in the infant room.
Aug 5, 20245 Findings5 Important
- Child Record - Enrollment Information - Other Emergency Cont250.04(6)(a)1.e.
Child #2 did not have an emergency contact listed in their file.
- Staff File - Staff Record Form250.05(2)(a)
There was no staff record form on file for Staff A.
- Potential Source Of Harm On Premises250.06(2)(e)
There was nightshade, a poisonous plant, coming through the fence in the outdoor play space. This was accessible to chil
- Food Storage, Temperatures250.06(9)(d)
The freezer registered at 4 degrees Fahrenheit.
- Pets & Animals - Excrement250.07(7)(g)
Animal excrement was observed in the mulch in the outdoor play space under the swing set.