Rehana Vaughn
Data last updated · May 2026
Quality Indicators
See Methodology →- Overall QualityCombines daily care quality (interactions, learning, environment) with structural features like staff-to-child ratios and teacher qualifications.5 / 5
- Process QualityThe quality of daily care — caregiver-child interactions, learning activities, and the emotional climate. Drawn from the state QRIS rating, accreditations, and Head Start CLASS observations.Not Available
- Structural QualityMeasurable features like staff-to-child ratios, group sizes, license status, and teacher qualifications. Provider-level data when available; otherwise the state regulatory baseline.5 / 5
Why this rating
This daycare earned 5 out of 5 stars overall. Structural quality reflects a license in good standing. The structural rating also includes Maryland's licensing baseline — what every licensed daycare in the state must meet. Maryland caps infant ratios at 1:3, toddler ratios at 1:3, and preschool ratios at 1:10. Lead teachers must hold a High School Diploma. Teachers must complete 12 hours of annual training. No objective process measures (e.g., state quality rating or national accreditation) are available for this daycare. The overall rating reflects structural features only.
Quality Recognitions & Accreditations
- Accreditations
- National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)Not Accredited
- National Accreditation Commission (NAC)Not Accredited
- National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA)Not Accredited
- National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)Not Accredited
Facility Info
- Facility type
- Family Child Care Home
- Age groups served
- Toddlers, Preschool, School-Age
- Licensed capacity
- 8
- Teacher-child ratios & group sizesState Minimum Displayed
Age Max ratio Max group Toddlers 1:3 9 Preschool 1:10 20
Teacher Credentials
- Lead teacher credentialState Minimum Displayed
- High School Diploma
Inspection History
Across 2 inspections since 2023, the issues cited most often were Children's Records & Files (2), Building & Premises Safety (2), and Staff Qualifications & Background Checks (1). Of 7 total findings, 1 was critical.
See All 2 Inspection Visits
Nov 20, 20242 Findings1 Critical1 Important
- LS Observed Potentially Harmful Items That Were Accessible to Children in Care; Specifically13A.15.10.02
LS observed potentially harmful items that were accessible to children in care; specifically, Lysol spray, cleaning supplies, and topical diaper cream. Provider made the items inaccessible at the time of the inspection by moving some of the items up on a shelf that is inaccessible and secured the l
- LS Observed No Evidence of a Maintained Professional Development Plan. Provider to Submit Completed Professional Development Plan.13A.15.06.02C(1)
Dec 1, 20235 Findings5 Important
- LS Observed Two (2) Children's Emergency Cards That Were Not Complete13A.15.03.04A(1)
LS observed two (2) children's emergency cards that were not complete. Provider to have parents fill out the form completely and submit a written statement that the emergency cards are in the child's file.
- LS Observed 2 Children's Files That Were Not Complete13A.15.03.04A(1)
LS observed 2 children's files that were not complete. Provider to have parents complete the entire form and submit a written statement verifying that the forms are in the child's files.
- LS Observed an Off Limits Area of the Home That Did Not Have a Protective Barrier13A.15.05.04B(2)
LS observed an off limits area of the home that did not have a protective barrier. Provider to submit photographic evidence that the protective barrier has been put in place.
- LS Observed an Off Limits Area of the Home That Did Not Have a Protective Barrier on It13A.15.05.04B(2)
LS observed an off limits area of the home that did not have a protective barrier on it. Provider to submit photographic evidence that a protective barrier was placed on the door.
- LS Observed a Blanket and Stuffed Animal in the Crib. Provider Immediately Removed the Items During the Inspection.13A.15.05.06F