Skip to main content
Childery

Singoma, Mwajuma dba Singoma Care

WEST VALLEY, UT 84120Childery Rating: 4/5

Data last updated ·

Quality Indicators

See Methodology →
  • Overall Quality
    4 / 5
  • Process Quality
    Not Available
  • Structural Quality
    4 / 5

Why this rating

This daycare earned 4 out of 5 stars overall. Structural quality reflects Utah's licensing baseline. Utah caps infant ratios at 1:4, toddler ratios at 1:5, and preschool ratios at 1:15. Lead-teacher education isn't regulated. Teachers must complete 20 hours of annual training. No objective process measures (e.g., state quality rating or national accreditation) are available for this daycare. The overall rating reflects structural features only.

Quality Recognitions & Accreditations

Accreditations
  • National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)Not Accredited
  • National Accreditation Commission (NAC)Not Accredited
  • National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA)Not Accredited
  • National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)Not Accredited

Facility Info

Facility type
Family Child Care Home
Age groups served
Infants, Toddlers, School-Age
Licensed capacity
Not Available
Teacher-child ratios & group sizesState Minimum Displayed
AgeMax ratioMax group
Infants1:48
Toddlers1:510

Teacher Credentials

Lead teacher credentialState Minimum Displayed
Not Regulated

Inspection History

4 Inspection Visits Since 2023 · 5 Findings
2 Critical3 Important

Across 4 inspections since 2023, the issues cited most often were Building & Premises Safety (3), Children's Records & Files (1), and Staff Qualifications & Background Checks (1). Of 5 total findings, 2 were critical.

See All 4 Inspection Visits
  1. Aug 6, 20241 Finding1 Important
    • The Provider Was Out of Compliance with This Rule by Not Having Required Forms for Each Child EnrolledR430-90-6(9)

      The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not having required forms for each child enrolled. At the time of the inspection, three children did not have a health assessment and one child did not have an admission or health assessment form. This was a repeat rule noncompliance.

  2. Jan 29, 20241 Finding1 Critical
    • The Provider Was Out of Compliance with This Rule by Having Toxic or Hazardous Chemicals Accessible to ChildrenR430-90-13(9)(a)-(d)

      The provider was out of compliance with this rule by having toxic or hazardous chemicals accessible to children. In the kitchen, there was a loose battery in an accessible drawer. This was a repeat rule noncompliance.

  3. Oct 10, 20232 Findings2 Important
    • The Provider Was Out of Compliance with This Rule by Having Electrical Outlets Without Protective CoversR430-90-13(11)(a)-(b)

      The provider was out of compliance with this rule by having electrical outlets without protective covers. In the accessible living room, there was one outlet without covers. In the accessible hallway and upstairs bedroom, there were outlets without covers. This was a repeat rule noncompliance.

    • The Provider Was Out of Compliance with This Rule by Having Choking Hazards Accessible to Children Younger Than 3 Years…R430-90-13(4)

      The provider was out of compliance with this rule by having choking hazards accessible to children younger than 3 years of age. In the living room, there were small bolts and nuts in the accessible closet. This was a repeat rule noncompliance.

  4. Aug 31, 20231 Finding1 Critical
    • The Provider Was Out of Compliance with This Rule by Having a Caregiver Who Was Providing Caregiving Duties, and They…R430-90-8(2)(a)-(d)

      The provider was out of compliance with this rule by having a caregiver who was providing caregiving duties, and they did not have a background clearance. In the facility, a caregiver was left alone with the children before properly passing a background clearance. This is a repeat violation.

Explore More

Daycares Near This One