St. John's CCDC- Sugarhouse
Data last updated · May 2026
Quality Indicators
See Methodology →- Overall QualityCombines daily care quality (interactions, learning, environment) with structural features like staff-to-child ratios and teacher qualifications.4 / 5
- Process QualityThe quality of daily care — caregiver-child interactions, learning activities, and the emotional climate. Drawn from the state QRIS rating, accreditations, and Head Start CLASS observations.Not Available
- Structural QualityMeasurable features like staff-to-child ratios, group sizes, license status, and teacher qualifications. Provider-level data when available; otherwise the state regulatory baseline.4 / 5
Why this rating
This daycare earned 4 out of 5 stars overall. Structural quality reflects Utah's licensing baseline. Utah caps infant ratios at 1:4, toddler ratios at 1:5, and preschool ratios at 1:15. Lead-teacher education isn't regulated. Teachers must complete 20 hours of annual training. No objective process measures (e.g., state quality rating or national accreditation) are available for this daycare. The overall rating reflects structural features only.
Quality Recognitions & Accreditations
- State Quality Rating
- Child Care Quality System Default Foundation of Quality Learn more →
- Accreditations
- National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)Not Accredited
- National Accreditation Commission (NAC)Not Accredited
- National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA)Not Accredited
- National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)Not Accredited
Facility Info
- Facility type
- Daycare
- Age groups served
- Infants, Toddlers, School-Age
- Licensed capacity
- Not Available
- Teacher-child ratios & group sizesState Minimum Displayed
Age Max ratio Max group Infants 1:4 8 Toddlers 1:5 10
Teacher Credentials
- Lead teacher credentialState Minimum Displayed
- Not Regulated
Inspection History
Across 3 inspections since 2025, the issues cited most often were Building & Premises Safety (2), Staff-to-Child Ratios & Group Size (1), and Food Safety & Allergic Reactions (1). None of the 5 findings were critical.
See All 3 Inspection Visits
Apr 27, 20261 Finding1 Important
- The Provider Was Out of Compliance with Rule R381-100-10(1)(c) by Not Ensuring That They Do Not Exceed the Number Of…R381-100-10(1)(a)-(c)
The provider was out of compliance with rule R381-100-10(1)(c) by not ensuring that they do not exceed the number of children in the caregiver-to-child ratio for a single-age group of children. In the Hoppers classroom, there were ten toddlers with two caregivers.
Apr 28, 20251 Finding1 Important
- The Provider Was Out of Compliance with Rule R381-100-9(18) by Not Ensuring the Fence Enclosing the Outdoor Area Is At…R381-100-9(18)
The provider was out of compliance with rule R381-100-9(18) by not ensuring the fence enclosing the outdoor area is at least four feet high. In the east play area, a part of the fence did not measure four feet high from the ground. This was a repeat rule noncompliance as noted on April 4, 2025.
Apr 4, 20253 Findings3 Important
- The Provider Was Out of Compliance with Rule R381-100-13(7) by Having Plastic Bags Large Enough to Fit a Child's Head…R381-100-13(7)
The provider was out of compliance with rule R381-100-13(7) by having plastic bags large enough to fit a child's head accessible to children younger than five years old. In the bathroom of the Crickets classroom, there were plastic garbage bags accessible to children.
- The Provider Was Out of Compliance with Rule R381-100-24(22)(b)-(c) by Not Documenting Each Toddler's Diaper Change…R381-100-24(22)(a)-(c)
The provider was out of compliance with rule R381-100-24(22)(b)-(c) by not documenting each toddler's diaper change each day within the hour. In the Crickets classroom, there were diaper changes that had not been documented. This was a repeat rule noncompliance as noted on December 18, 2023.
- The Provider Was Out of Compliance with Rule R381-100-9(18) by Not Ensuring the Fence Enclosing the Outdoor Area Is At…R381-100-9(18)
The provider was out of compliance with rule R381-100-9(18) by not ensuring the fence enclosing the outdoor area is at least four feet high. In the east play area, a part of the fence did not measure four feet high from the ground.