St. John's Community Child Development Center-Sandy
Data last updated · May 2026
Quality Indicators
See Methodology →- Overall QualityCombines daily care quality (interactions, learning, environment) with structural features like staff-to-child ratios and teacher qualifications.4 / 5
- Process QualityThe quality of daily care — caregiver-child interactions, learning activities, and the emotional climate. Drawn from the state QRIS rating, accreditations, and Head Start CLASS observations.Not Available
- Structural QualityMeasurable features like staff-to-child ratios, group sizes, license status, and teacher qualifications. Provider-level data when available; otherwise the state regulatory baseline.4 / 5
Why this rating
This daycare earned 4 out of 5 stars overall. Structural quality reflects Utah's licensing baseline. Utah caps infant ratios at 1:4, toddler ratios at 1:5, and preschool ratios at 1:15. Lead-teacher education isn't regulated. Teachers must complete 20 hours of annual training. No objective process measures (e.g., state quality rating or national accreditation) are available for this daycare. The overall rating reflects structural features only.
Quality Recognitions & Accreditations
- State Quality Rating
- Child Care Quality System Default Foundation of Quality Learn more →
- Accreditations
- National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)Not Accredited
- National Accreditation Commission (NAC)Not Accredited
- National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA)Not Accredited
- National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)Not Accredited
Facility Info
- Facility type
- Daycare
- Age groups served
- Infants, Toddlers
- Licensed capacity
- Not Available
- Teacher-child ratios & group sizesState Minimum Displayed
Age Max ratio Max group Infants 1:4 8 Toddlers 1:5 10
Teacher Credentials
- Lead teacher credentialState Minimum Displayed
- Not Regulated
Inspection History
Across 1 inspection since 2025, the issues cited most often were Food Safety & Allergic Reactions (1), Hazardous Materials Handling (1), and Staff Qualifications & Background Checks (1). None of the 4 findings were critical.
See the Inspection Visit
Jun 25, 20254 Findings4 Important
- The Provider Was Out of Compliance with Rule R381-100-13(4) by Having Choking Hazards Accessible to Children Younger…R381-100-13(4)
The provider was out of compliance with rule R381-100-13(4) by having choking hazards accessible to children younger than three years old. In 4-5s classroom, there were choking hazards accessible to children younger than three years old. This was a repeat rule noncompliance as noted on May 29, 2024.
- The Provider Was Out of Compliance with Rule R381-100-16(1) by Not Offering a Meal or Snack at Least Once Every Three…R381-100-16(1)
The provider was out of compliance with rule R381-100-16(1) by not offering a meal or snack at least once every three hours to children two years old and older. In the Camp Wildlife classroom, the children were not offered a snack or meal at least every three hours.
- The Provider Was Out of Compliance with Rule R381-100-6(10) by Not Ensuring That a Child Had a Completed Admission And…R381-100-6(10)
The provider was out of compliance with rule R381-100-6(10) by not ensuring that a child had a completed admission and health assessment form before being admitted into the program. At the facility, a child did not have a completed health assessment form.
- The Provider Was Out of Compliance with Rule R381-100-8(1)(a) by Not Ensuring Each Individual Involved with Child Care…R381-100-8(1)(a)-(b)
The provider was out of compliance with rule R381-100-8(1)(a) by not ensuring each individual involved with child care was associated with the facility through the provider portal. At the time of the inspection, there were three individuals involved with the child care program for more than one busi