St. Peter Faber Academy
Data last updated · May 2026
Quality Indicators
See Methodology →- Overall QualityCombines daily care quality (interactions, learning, environment) with structural features like staff-to-child ratios and teacher qualifications.3 / 5
- Process QualityThe quality of daily care — caregiver-child interactions, learning activities, and the emotional climate. Drawn from the state QRIS rating, accreditations, and Head Start CLASS observations.Not Available
- Structural QualityMeasurable features like staff-to-child ratios, group sizes, license status, and teacher qualifications. Provider-level data when available; otherwise the state regulatory baseline.3 / 5
Why this rating
This daycare earned 3 out of 5 stars overall. Structural quality reflects Ohio's state-funded pre-K program standards (stronger ratios, group sizes, and teacher requirements than the general licensing minimum), applied because this facility operates a state-funded pre-K classroom. No objective process measures (e.g., state quality rating or national accreditation) are available for this daycare. The overall rating reflects structural features only.
Quality Recognitions & Accreditations
- Accreditations
- National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)Not Accredited
- National Accreditation Commission (NAC)Not Accredited
- National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA)Not Accredited
- National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)Not Accredited
Facility Info
- Facility type
- Public School Pre-K
- Age groups served
- Not Available
- Licensed capacity
- Not Available
- Teacher-child ratios & group sizesProgram Standard
Age Max ratio Max group Infants 1:5 12 Toddlers 1:7 14 Preschool 1:14 28 - Preschool standard from the Ohio licensed school-based preschool program; other ages show the OH licensing floor.
Teacher Credentials
- Lead teacher credential
- Bachelor's Degree
Inspection History
Across 1 inspection since 2026, the issues cited most often were Licensing & Administrative Compliance (4), Staff Qualifications & Background Checks (3), and Curriculum & Developmental Programming (1). None of the 9 findings were critical.
See the Inspection Visit
Jan 29, 20269 Findings9 Important
- Orientation Training5180-37:04
During the inspection and review of staff files, individuals used in ratio did not have documentation of the required orientation training prescribed by the department completed within thirty days of the start date.
- Non-guilty Non-conviction Statement5180-37:04
During the inspection and review of staff files, individuals used in ratio did not have a non-guilty non- conviction statement signed annually.
- Staff Medical Statement5180-37:04
During the inspection and review of staff files, individuals used to count in ratio did not have evidence of a signed medical statement on or before the first day of employment. 02/06/2026 Page 3 of 10 Chine Department of ~ Children & Youth
- Cot or Mat Requirements5180-37:06
During the inspection, it was observed that a mat is not at least one inch thick. 02/06/2026 Page 2 of 10 hiv Department of ~ Children & Youth
- Emergency Procedure Postings and Records5180-37:07
During the inspection, it was determined that emergency procedures were not posted in the second classroom, nap room or lunch room.
- Medical and Dental Emergency Procedure Posting5180-37:07
During the inspection, it was determined that medical and dental emergency procedures were not posted in each preschool classroom and by each telephone (nap room; lunch room).
- Parent Roster Permission5180-37:07
During the inspection, it was determined that staff members did not secure a signed statement from parent indicating desire to be included in the roster.
- Child Medical Statement5180-37:08
During the inspection, and a review of children's files, it was determined that a medical was not provided for a child three years old or older within 30 days of admission and/or the examination did not occur within twelve months prior to the date of admission.
- Choice of Two Required Food Groups for Snack5180-37:09
During the inspection, the program provided snack that did not include a choice from at least two food groups from the required list.