Sunrise Montessori School - Layton
Data last updated · May 2026
Quality Indicators
See Methodology →- Overall QualityCombines daily care quality (interactions, learning, environment) with structural features like staff-to-child ratios and teacher qualifications.4 / 5
- Process QualityThe quality of daily care — caregiver-child interactions, learning activities, and the emotional climate. Drawn from the state QRIS rating, accreditations, and Head Start CLASS observations.Not Available
- Structural QualityMeasurable features like staff-to-child ratios, group sizes, license status, and teacher qualifications. Provider-level data when available; otherwise the state regulatory baseline.4 / 5
Why this rating
This daycare earned 4 out of 5 stars overall. Structural quality reflects Utah's licensing baseline. Utah caps infant ratios at 1:4, toddler ratios at 1:5, and preschool ratios at 1:15. Lead-teacher education isn't regulated. Teachers must complete 20 hours of annual training. No objective process measures (e.g., state quality rating or national accreditation) are available for this daycare. The overall rating reflects structural features only.
Quality Recognitions & Accreditations
- State Quality Rating
- Child Care Quality System Default Foundation of Quality Learn more →
- Accreditations
- National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)Not Accredited
- National Accreditation Commission (NAC)Not Accredited
- National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA)Not Accredited
- National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)Not Accredited
Facility Info
- Facility type
- Daycare
- Age groups served
- Toddlers, School-Age
- Licensed capacity
- Not Available
- Teacher-child ratios & group sizesState Minimum Displayed
Age Max ratio Max group Toddlers 1:5 10
Teacher Credentials
- Lead teacher credentialState Minimum Displayed
- Not Regulated
Inspection History
Across 2 inspections since 2025, the issues cited most often were Staff Qualifications & Background Checks (2), Children's Records & Files (2), and Emergency Preparedness & Drills (1). None of the 5 findings were critical.
See All 2 Inspection Visits
Feb 11, 20251 Finding1 Important
- The Provider Was Out of Compliance with This Rule by Not Conducting Disaster Drills at Least Once Every Six MonthsR381-100-14(6)
The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not conducting disaster drills at least once every six months. At the time of the inspection, the provider had not conducted a disaster drill in the last six months. This was a repeat rule noncompliance.
Jan 22, 20254 Findings4 Important
- The Provider Was Out of Compliance with This Rule by Not Ensuring That the Parent Completed a Health Assessment Form…R381-100-6(10)
The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring that the parent completed a health assessment form for their child before the child was admitted into the child care program. At the time of the inspection, there was a child in care whose parent did not complete a health assessment
- The Provider Was Out of Compliance with This Rule by Not Ensuring That the Admission and Health Assessment Form Was…R381-100-6(12)(a)-(b)
The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring that the admission and health assessment form was reviewed, updated, and signed or initialed by the parent at least annually. At the time of the inspection, the admission and health assessment form for one child had not been reviewed
- The Provider Was Out of Compliance with This Rule by Not Ensuring That Caregivers Completed the 2-1/2 Hours Of…R381-100-7(9)(a)-(g)
The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring that caregivers completed the 2-1/2 hours of preservice training offered by the department before caring for children. At the time of the inspection, there was a caregiver who had been caring for children who did not complete the 2-1
- The Provider Was Out of Compliance with This Rule by Not Receiving Notice From CCL That an Individual Was Eligible…R381-100-8(2)(a)-(d)
The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not receiving notice from CCL that an individual was eligible before becoming involved with child care. At the time of the inspection, there was an individual who had been involved with child care at the facility for about a month who did not hav