Tackmann Rachel Sue
Data last updated · May 2026
Quality Indicators
See Methodology →- Overall QualityCombines daily care quality (interactions, learning, environment) with structural features like staff-to-child ratios and teacher qualifications.5 / 5
- Process QualityThe quality of daily care — caregiver-child interactions, learning activities, and the emotional climate. Drawn from the state QRIS rating, accreditations, and Head Start CLASS observations.Not Available
- Structural QualityMeasurable features like staff-to-child ratios, group sizes, license status, and teacher qualifications. Provider-level data when available; otherwise the state regulatory baseline.5 / 5
Why this rating
This daycare earned 5 out of 5 stars overall. Structural quality reflects a license in good standing. The structural rating also includes Minnesota's licensing baseline — what every licensed daycare in the state must meet. Minnesota caps infant ratios at 1:4, toddler ratios at 1:7, and preschool ratios at 1:10. Lead teachers must hold a Child Development Associate (CDA). Teachers must complete 24 hours of annual training. No objective process measures (e.g., state quality rating or national accreditation) are available for this daycare. The overall rating reflects structural features only.
Quality Recognitions & Accreditations
- Accreditations
- National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)Not Accredited
- National Accreditation Commission (NAC)Not Accredited
- National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA)Not Accredited
- National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)Not Accredited
Facility Info
- Facility type
- Family Child Care Home
- Age groups served
- Infants, Toddlers, Preschool, School-Age
- Licensed capacity
- 14
- Teacher-child ratios & group sizesState Minimum Displayed
Age Max ratio Max group Infants 1:4 8 Toddlers 1:7 14 Preschool 1:10 20
Teacher Credentials
- Lead teacher credentialState Minimum Displayed
- Child Development Associate (CDA)
Inspection History
Across 2 inspections since 2024, the issues cited most often were Infectious Disease Prevention & Control (6), Safe Sleep & SIDS Prevention (2), and Children's Records & Files (1). Of 13 total findings, 2 were critical.
See All 2 Inspection Visits
May 11, 20265 Findings1 Critical4 Important
- Sanitation and HealthMinn. R. 9502.0435 subp. 4
Toxic substances were accessible to children. Correction: Under Appeal
- Sanitation and HealthMinn. R. 9502.0435 subp. 12 item C
Provider did not follow notification and safety standards for pets. Correction: Under Appeal
- Sanitation and HealthMinn. R. 9502.0435 subp. 15.A
Water was too hot in areas accessible to children. Correction: Under Appeal
- Crib Safety - MeshMinn. Stat. 142B.45 subd. 3(e)(1)
Mesh-sided or fabric-sided crib was damaged. Correction: Under Appeal
- Cribs - AllMinn. Stat. 142B.46(c)
Sleeping infant not placed in crib or kept in sight of caregiver. Correction: Under Appeal
Aug 5, 20248 Findings1 Critical7 Important
- Sanitation and HealthMinn. R. 9502.0435 subp. 4
Toxic substances were accessible to children. Correction: Corrected on site
- Children's RecordsMinn. R. 9502.0405 subp. 4.D
Provider did not get written consent from parents or guardians for emergency medical care.
- Sanitation and HealthMinn. R. 9502.0435 subp. 3
Garbage containers were accessible to infants and toddlers.
- Sanitation and HealthMinn. R. 9502.0435 subp. 6
Hazardous materials were not used or stored safely.
- Water, Food, and NutritionMinn. R. 9502.0445 subp. 3.D
Food items brought from home were not labeled with the child's name or refrigerated when necessary.
- Water, Food, and NutritionMinn. R. 9502.0445 subp. 4.C
Appliances for food storage and preparation were not safe or clean.
- Physical EnvironmentMinn. Stat. 245A.52 subd. 5(b)
Smoke alarm did not meet safety standards. Correction: Corrected on site
- Substitute TrackingMinn. Stat. 245A.53 subd. 1
Required information was not documented when a substitute provided care.