Skip to main content
Childery

The Treehouse Preschool Inc

Data last updated · May 2026

Quality Indicators

See Methodology →
  • Overall Quality
    4 / 5
  • Process Quality
    4 / 5
  • Structural Quality
    5 / 5

Why this rating

This daycare earned 4 out of 5 stars overall. Process quality reflects a Quality First rating of Level 4 (out of 5). Structural quality reflects a license in good standing. The structural rating also includes Arizona's licensing baseline — what every licensed daycare in the state must meet. Arizona caps infant ratios at 1:5, toddler ratios at 1:6, and preschool ratios at 1:15. Lead teachers must hold a High School Diploma. Teachers must complete 18 hours of annual training.

Quality Recognitions & Accreditations

State Quality Rating
Quality First Level 4 (Max 5) Learn more →
Accreditations
  • National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)Not Accredited
  • National Accreditation Commission (NAC)Not Accredited
  • National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA)Not Accredited
  • National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)Not Accredited

Facility Info

Facility type
Child Care Center
Age groups served
Infants, Toddlers, Preschool
Licensed capacity
208
Teacher-child ratios & group sizesState Minimum Displayed
AgeMax ratioMax group
Infants1:5Not Regulated
Toddlers1:6Not Regulated
Preschool1:15Not Regulated

Teacher Credentials

Lead teacher credentialState Minimum Displayed
High School Diploma

Inspection History

7 Inspection Visits Since 2023 · 7 Findings
7 Important

Across 7 inspections since 2023, the issues cited most often were Licensing & Administrative Compliance (7). None of the 7 findings were critical.

See All 7 Inspection Visits
  1. Jan 14, 20261 Finding1 Important
    • There Were Zero Deficiencies Observed at the Time of the Annual Compliance Inspection Conducted on 1/14/26, and Are…Compliance (Annual)

      There were zero deficiencies observed at the time of the Annual Compliance Inspection conducted on 1/14/26, and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. The Compliance Officer provided the facility with a paper copy of the Notice of Inspection Rights at the start of the inspection. A full inspection was conducted at this time. 2 of 2 fingerprint clearance cards were verified to be valid through the DPS website during the time of the inspection. The Emergency Disaster Conta

  2. Jan 22, 20251 Finding1 Important
    • The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of the Compliance Inspection Conducted on 1/22/25 and Are Subject…Compliance (Annual)

      The following deficiencies were observed at the time of the compliance inspection conducted on 1/22/25 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. Compliance Officer # 1: Brian Howell Compliance Officer # 2: Archana Navin 4 of 4 Fingerprint clearance cards reviewed were valid via a DPS website search. The Written Document of Corrections is due within 10 days

  3. Aug 16, 20241 Finding1 Important
    • There Were No Deficiencies at the Time of Complaints #00086120Complaint

      There were no deficiencies at the time of Complaints #00086120, #00086387 and #00086552 investigation conducted on 8/16/24. Compliance Officer # 1: Brian Howell A complete inspection of the facility was not conducted. The following classroom ratios were observed: Infants: 3:7 Ones: 2:9 Twos: 2:12 Threes: 2:8 Threes: 2:7 Fours: 1:7 Four staff members were interviewed during this investigation. The following documentation was reviewed: Incident reports. Staff written stateme

  4. Mar 5, 20241 Finding1 Important
    • The Purpose of the Inspection Was to Conduct a Complaint Investigation for Case # 68692 on March 5, 2024Complaint

      The purpose of the inspection was to conduct a complaint investigation for case # 68692 on March 5, 2024. A full compliance was not conducted. Senior Compliance Officer Brenda Alubowicz Compliance Officer Katie Corrow Ratios observed were: 1's 3:15 Infant Room 1 3:8 Infant Room 2 1:4 2's 3:17 3's 2:12 3/4's 1:9 4/5's 2:14 There were four staff interviewed at the time of the investigation. There was one child's file reviewed during the investigation. Others interviewe

  5. Feb 5, 20241 Finding1 Important
    • The Purpose of the Inspection Was to Conduct a Complaint Investigation for Case # 68332 on 2/5/24Complaint Compliance (Annual)

      The purpose of the inspection was to conduct a complaint investigation for case # 68332 on 2/5/24. A compliance inspection was also conducted. Senior Compliance Officer - Brenda Alubowicz Compliance Officer - Katie Corrow 2 of 2 fingerprint clearance cards were found to be valid via the DPS website. Ratios observed: Infant Room 1 - 1:5 Infant Room 2 - 2:6 One-Year-Old's - 2:13 Two/Three-Year Old'

  6. Jan 8, 20241 Finding1 Important
    • The Purpose of the Inspection Was to Conduct a Complaint Investigation or Case # 67485 on January 9, 2024Complaint

      The purpose of the inspection was to conduct a complaint investigation or case # 67485 on January 9, 2024. A full inspection was not completed. Senior Compliance Officer - Brenda Alubowicz Compliance Officer - Katie Corrow One fingerprint clearance card was found to be valid via the DPS website. Ratios observed: Infant Room 1 - 2:8 Infant Room 2 - 1:4 Two's - 3:18 Three's - 1:9 Three's/Four's - 1:7 Four's/Five's - 1:11 There were 9 staff interviewed during the complain

  7. Aug 7, 20231 Finding1 Important
    • The Purpose of the Inspection Was to Conduct a Complaint Investigation for Case # 61299 on August 7, 2023Complaint

      The purpose of the inspection was to conduct a complaint investigation for case # 61299 on August 7, 2023. A full inspection was not conducted. Senior Compliance Officer - Brenda Alubowicz Compliance Officer - Katie Corrow Ratios observed were: Infants - 3:8 Infants- 2:4 1's -2:9 2'- 3:13 2/3's - 1:6 3/4's - 1:8 4/5's : 2:10 There were four staff interviewed during this investigation. There was one staff file reviewed during this investigation. There was on child's file