Time for Families, Davis County
Data last updated · May 2026
Quality Indicators
See Methodology →- Overall QualityCombines daily care quality (interactions, learning, environment) with structural features like staff-to-child ratios and teacher qualifications.4 / 5
- Process QualityThe quality of daily care — caregiver-child interactions, learning activities, and the emotional climate. Drawn from the state QRIS rating, accreditations, and Head Start CLASS observations.Not Available
- Structural QualityMeasurable features like staff-to-child ratios, group sizes, license status, and teacher qualifications. Provider-level data when available; otherwise the state regulatory baseline.4 / 5
Why this rating
This daycare earned 4 out of 5 stars overall. Structural quality reflects Utah's licensing baseline. Utah caps infant ratios at 1:4, toddler ratios at 1:5, and preschool ratios at 1:15. Lead-teacher education isn't regulated. Teachers must complete 20 hours of annual training. No objective process measures (e.g., state quality rating or national accreditation) are available for this daycare. The overall rating reflects structural features only.
Quality Recognitions & Accreditations
- State Quality Rating
- Child Care Quality System Certified Foundation of Quality Learn more →
- Accreditations
- National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)Not Accredited
- National Accreditation Commission (NAC)Not Accredited
- National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA)Not Accredited
- National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)Not Accredited
Facility Info
- Facility type
- Daycare
- Age groups served
- Infants, Toddlers, School-Age
- Licensed capacity
- Not Available
- Teacher-child ratios & group sizesState Minimum Displayed
Age Max ratio Max group Infants 1:4 8 Toddlers 1:5 10
Teacher Credentials
- Lead teacher credentialState Minimum Displayed
- Not Regulated
Inspection History
Across 3 inspections since 2024, the issues cited most often were Hazardous Materials Handling (2), Building & Premises Safety (1), and Licensing & Administrative Compliance (1). Of 5 total findings, 2 were critical.
See All 3 Inspection Visits
Jul 8, 20251 Finding1 Important
- The Provider Was Out of Compliance with Rule R381-100-19(14)(a) by Not Ensuring That Protective Cushioning Met The…R381-100-19(14)(a)-(c)
The provider was out of compliance with rule R381-100-19(14)(a) by not ensuring that protective cushioning met the required depth or thickness determined by the highest designated play surface. In the 3 and above playground, the average depth of the shredded tire did not meet the required depth.
May 20, 20251 Finding1 Critical
- The Licensee Was Out of Compliance with R380-600-7(16)(a) by Not Reporting a Critical Incident to the Office Within One…R380-600-7(16)(a)-(e)
The Licensee was out of compliance with R380-600-7(16)(a) by not reporting a critical incident to the Office within one business day. During review of critical incidents it was identified that the incident occurred on 05/12/2025 and was not reported until 05/15/2025.
Dec 30, 20243 Findings1 Critical2 Important
- The Provider Was Out of Compliance with This Rule by Having Toxic or Hazardous Chemicals Accessible to ChildrenR381-100-13(9)(a)-(d)
The provider was out of compliance with this rule by having toxic or hazardous chemicals accessible to children. In the infant room, there was dish soap by the sink accessible to children. This was a repeat rule noncompliance.
- The Provider Was Out of Compliance with This Rule by Having an Empty Plastic Bag Large Enough for a Child's Head to Fit…R381-100-13(7)
The provider was out of compliance with this rule by having an empty plastic bag large enough for a child's head to fit inside accessible to children younger than 5 years of age. In the pre-k room, there was an empty plastic bag accessible to children. This was a repeat rule noncompliance.
- The Provider Was Out of Compliance with This Rule by Having Prescription Medications Without the Original Labels Or…R381-100-17(3)(a)-(d)
The provider was out of compliance with this rule by having prescription medications without the original labels or pharmacy containers. At the facility, there were 3 prescription medications that did not have the original labels or pharmacy containers. This was a repeat rule noncompliance.