Tina Evelyn-Cunningham
Data last updated · May 2026
Quality Indicators
See Methodology →- Overall QualityCombines daily care quality (interactions, learning, environment) with structural features like staff-to-child ratios and teacher qualifications.3 / 5
- Process QualityThe quality of daily care — caregiver-child interactions, learning activities, and the emotional climate. Drawn from the state QRIS rating, accreditations, and Head Start CLASS observations.2 / 5
- Structural QualityMeasurable features like staff-to-child ratios, group sizes, license status, and teacher qualifications. Provider-level data when available; otherwise the state regulatory baseline.5 / 5
Why this rating
This daycare earned 3 out of 5 stars overall. Process quality reflects a Maryland EXCELS rating of Level 1 (out of 5). Structural quality reflects a license in good standing. The structural rating also includes Maryland's licensing baseline — what every licensed daycare in the state must meet. Maryland caps infant ratios at 1:3, toddler ratios at 1:3, and preschool ratios at 1:10. Lead teachers must hold a High School Diploma. Teachers must complete 12 hours of annual training.
Quality Recognitions & Accreditations
- State Quality Rating
- Maryland EXCELS Level 1 (Max 5) Learn more →
- Accreditations
- National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)Not Accredited
- National Accreditation Commission (NAC)Not Accredited
- National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA)Not Accredited
- National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)Not Accredited
Facility Info
- Facility type
- Family Child Care Home
- Age groups served
- Toddlers, Preschool, School-Age
- Licensed capacity
- 8
- Teacher-child ratios & group sizesState Minimum Displayed
Age Max ratio Max group Toddlers 1:3 9 Preschool 1:10 20
Teacher Credentials
- Lead teacher credentialState Minimum Displayed
- High School Diploma
Inspection History
Across 2 inspections since 2023, the issues cited most often were Children's Records & Files (5), First Aid & Pediatric CPR (2), and Medication Administration (2). Of 11 total findings, 2 were critical.
See All 2 Inspection Visits
Oct 9, 20257 Findings2 Critical5 Important
- One Child in Care Had an Epi Pen Listed on the Emergency Card13A.15.11.04A(1)(a)
One child in care had an Epi Pen listed on the emergency card. There was not an epi pen present at this inspection. Please submit a picture of the EpiPen.
- There Was No Documentation Concerning the Epi Pen for the Child in Care13A.15.11.04A(1)(b)
There was no documentation concerning the Epi Pen for the child in care. Please provide all of this information as soon as possible. If the child does not require the epi pen any longer please submit a note from the doctor.
- One Child in Care Did Not Have an Emergency Form.13A.15.03.02A
- Children Were Missing the Lead Screening.13A.15.03.02B
- One Child in Care Did Not Have an Emergency Card. Please Submit the Emergency Card as Soon as Possible.13A.15.03.04A(1)
- Children Were Missing the Lead Screening, the Second Page of the Emergency Card, and Health Inventory Pages 1 and 2.13A.15.03.04C
- The First Aid Kit Was Missing the Following Item- Gauze Rolls (2), Liquid Fragrance Free Soap, and Tweezers13A.15.10.01H(1)
The first aid kit was missing the following item- gauze rolls (2), liquid fragrance free soap, and tweezers. Please submit pictures of these items.
Oct 13, 20234 Findings4 Important
- Several Children Were Missing the Lead Screening.13A.15.03.02B
- The Provider and a Substitute Had Expired First Aid and CPR Cards13A.15.06.02D(1)
The provider and a substitute had expired First Aid and CPR cards. These cards expired 8/2023. Provider and substitute to complete First aid and submit cards as soon as possible.
- The Substitute Has Not Been Printed Since 2/2018.13A.15.06.03D(4)
- The Additional Adult Has Not Been Printed Since 2/2018.13A.15.06.04A(4)