Union Baptist Harvey Johnson
Data last updated · May 2026
Quality Indicators
See Methodology →- Overall QualityCombines daily care quality (interactions, learning, environment) with structural features like staff-to-child ratios and teacher qualifications.5 / 5
- Process QualityThe quality of daily care — caregiver-child interactions, learning activities, and the emotional climate. Drawn from the state QRIS rating, accreditations, and Head Start CLASS observations.5 / 5
- Structural QualityMeasurable features like staff-to-child ratios, group sizes, license status, and teacher qualifications. Provider-level data when available; otherwise the state regulatory baseline.5 / 5
Why this rating
This daycare earned 5 out of 5 stars overall. Process quality reflects a Maryland EXCELS rating of Level 5 (out of 5). Structural quality reflects a license in good standing. The structural rating also includes Maryland's licensing baseline — what every licensed daycare in the state must meet. Maryland caps infant ratios at 1:3, toddler ratios at 1:3, and preschool ratios at 1:10. Lead teachers must hold a High School Diploma. Teachers must complete 12 hours of annual training.
Quality Recognitions & Accreditations
- State Quality Rating
- Maryland EXCELS Level 5 (Max 5) Learn more →
- Accreditations
- National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)Not Accredited
- National Accreditation Commission (NAC)Not Accredited
- National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA)Not Accredited
- National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)Not Accredited
- Recognized by Maryland Accreditation.
Facility Info
- Facility type
- Child Care Center
- Age groups served
- Preschool, School-Age
- Licensed capacity
- 175
- Teacher-child ratios & group sizesState Minimum Displayed
Age Max ratio Max group Preschool 1:10 20
Teacher Credentials
- Lead teacher credentialState Minimum Displayed
- High School Diploma
Inspection History
1 Inspection Visit Since 2024 · 12 Findings
Most recent: Jan 9, 2026⤓ Download Inspection History Report (PDF)
1 Critical11 Important
Across 1 inspection since 2024, the issues cited most often were Discipline & Adult-Child Interaction (6), Staff-to-Child Ratios & Group Size (5), and Staff Qualifications & Background Checks (1). Of 12 total findings, 1 was critical.
See the Inspection Visit
Mar 12, 202412 Findings1 Critical11 Important
- Teacher or Teacher's Aide Did Not Report Incident to Supervisors or CPS.13A.16.07.02A(1)
- OCC Was Not Notified of the Parent Volunteer in the Classroom.13A.16.03.06A(1)
- LS Observed a Child Being Plucked in the Mouth.13A.16.07.01
- The Child Was Plucked in the Mouth.13A.16.07.02B
- LS Witnessed a Parent Volunteer Plucking a Child in the Mouth and Teaching Staff Did Nothing to Stop the Incident.13A.16.07.03B(4)
- LS Did Not Observe What Was Set in Center Policy for Effective Discipline.13A.16.07.03C(3)
- LS Observed a Child Being Taken From the Classroom by the Parent Volunteer Who Was Not the Parent of the Child.13A.16.07.05
- LS Observed the Child Being Taken Out of the Classroom by an Individual Who Is Unknown to OCC in Video Footage.13A.16.07.06A
- Parent Volunteer Was Not Cleared to Work with Children by OCC, and Was Observed to Be Alone with the Child Without Authorized Staff.13A.16.07.06C
- LS Observed the Child Was Being Taken From the Classroom by an Unknown Individual Without an Authorized Staff.13A.16.08.01A(2)(a)
- LS Observe an Unknown Individual to OCC Being Left Alone with the Child.13A.16.08.02A
- LS Observed 16 Three Year Old's Alone with One Teacher.13A.16.08.03A