Skip to main content
Childery

Villagra, Rosa Maria

Data last updated · May 2026

Quality Indicators

See Methodology →
  • Overall Quality
    4 / 5
  • Process Quality
    Not Available
  • Structural Quality
    4 / 5

Why this rating

This daycare earned 4 out of 5 stars overall. Structural quality reflects Utah's licensing baseline. Utah caps infant ratios at 1:4, toddler ratios at 1:5, and preschool ratios at 1:15. Lead-teacher education isn't regulated. Teachers must complete 20 hours of annual training. No objective process measures (e.g., state quality rating or national accreditation) are available for this daycare. The overall rating reflects structural features only.

Quality Recognitions & Accreditations

State Quality Rating
Child Care Quality System Default Foundation of Quality Learn more →
Accreditations
  • National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)Not Accredited
  • National Accreditation Commission (NAC)Not Accredited
  • National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA)Not Accredited
  • National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)Not Accredited

Facility Info

Facility type
Family Child Care Home
Age groups served
Infants, Toddlers, School-Age
Licensed capacity
Not Available
Teacher-child ratios & group sizesState Minimum Displayed
AgeMax ratioMax group
Infants1:48
Toddlers1:510

Teacher Credentials

Lead teacher credentialState Minimum Displayed
Not Regulated

Inspection History

3 Inspection Visits Since 2024 · 5 Findings
1 Critical4 Important

Across 3 inspections since 2024, the issues cited most often were Staff-to-Child Ratios & Group Size (3) and Building & Premises Safety (2). Of 5 total findings, 1 was critical.

See All 3 Inspection Visits
  1. May 20, 20251 Finding1 Important
    • The Licensee Was Out of Compliance with R430-90-11(10)(a)-(f) by Not Signing Each Child InR430-90-11(10)(a)-(f)

      The Licensee was out of compliance with R430-90-11(10)(a)-(f) by not signing each child in. During the inspection, seven children were not signed in. This was a repeat rule noncompliance as noted on 01/30/2023, 05/22/2023, 06/02/2023, 02/08/2024, 03/06/2024, 11/22/2024, and 01/16/2025.

  2. Jan 16, 20251 Finding1 Important
    • The Provider Was Out of Compliance with This Rule by Not Ensuring Children in Care Were Signed InR430-90-11(10)(a)-(f)

      The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring children in care were signed in. At the time of the inspection, there were two children that were not signed in. This was a repeat rule noncompliance.

  3. Nov 22, 20243 Findings1 Critical2 Important
    • The Provider Was Out of Compliance with This Rule by Having Toxic or Hazardous Chemicals AccessibleR430-90-13(9)(a)-(d)

      The provider was out of compliance with this rule by having toxic or hazardous chemicals accessible. In the living room, there was laundry detergent on the floor. This was a repeat rule noncompliance.

    • The Provider Was Out of Compliance with This Rule by Not Signing the Children InR430-90-11(10)(a)-(f)

      The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not signing the children in. At the time of the inspection, seven children were not signed in. This was a repeat rule noncompliance.

    • The Provider Was Out of Compliance with This Rule by Having Accessible Outlets Without Protective CoversR430-90-13(11)(a)-(b)

      The provider was out of compliance with this rule by having accessible outlets without protective covers. In the living room, there were uncovered outlets. This was a repeat rule noncompliance.