Skip to main content
Childery

Y Academy at Monterey Park

Data last updated · May 2026

Quality Indicators

See Methodology →
  • Overall Quality
    5 / 5
  • Process Quality
    Not Available
  • Structural Quality
    5 / 5

Why this rating

This daycare earned 5 out of 5 stars overall. Structural quality reflects a license in good standing. The structural rating also includes Arizona's licensing baseline — what every licensed daycare in the state must meet. Arizona caps infant ratios at 1:5, toddler ratios at 1:6, and preschool ratios at 1:15. Lead teachers must hold a High School Diploma. Teachers must complete 18 hours of annual training. No objective process measures (e.g., state quality rating or national accreditation) are available for this daycare. The overall rating reflects structural features only.

Quality Recognitions & Accreditations

Accreditations
  • National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)Not Accredited
  • National Accreditation Commission (NAC)Not Accredited
  • National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA)Not Accredited
  • National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)Not Accredited

Facility Info

Facility type
Child Care Center
Age groups served
Infants, Toddlers, Preschool
Licensed capacity
125
Teacher-child ratios & group sizesState Minimum Displayed
AgeMax ratioMax group
Infants1:5Not Regulated
Toddlers1:6Not Regulated
Preschool1:15Not Regulated

Teacher Credentials

Lead teacher credentialState Minimum Displayed
High School Diploma

Inspection History

7 Inspection Visits Since 2024 · 7 Findings
7 Important

Across 7 inspections since 2024, the issues cited most often were Licensing & Administrative Compliance (7). None of the 7 findings were critical.

See All 7 Inspection Visits
  1. Mar 5, 20261 Finding1 Important
    • State of Deficiencies Amended on 4.15.26Complaint

      State of Deficiencies Amended on 4.15.26. The purpose of this inspection was to conduct complaint investigation #00160969 on 3/05/2026. A full inspection was not conducted at this time. A Plan of Corrections will not be accepted at this time. The following ratios were observed: Infants: 1:5 Ones: 1:5 Twos: 1:5 Threes/Fours/Fives: 2:14 The complainant was interviewed as part of this investigation. Four staff members were interviewed as part of this investigation. Two of tw

  2. Dec 8, 20251 Finding1 Important
    • The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of the Modification Compliance Inspection Conducted on 12/8/25 And…Modification

      The following deficiencies were observed at the time of the Modification Compliance Inspection conducted on 12/8/25 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. A full inspection was not conducted. Please submit the Plan of Corrections via the LMS portal within 10 days of receipt of the Statement of Deficiencies. A copy of the Notice of Inspection Rights was provided at the time of the inspection. During the exit interview, the following items were discussed but are not limi

  3. Nov 13, 20251 Finding1 Important
    • The Following Deficiency Was Observed at the Time of the Complaint Investigation Conducted on 11/13/25 for Case…Complaint

      The following deficiency was observed at the time of the complaint investigation conducted on 11/13/25 for case #00149146 and is subject to changes pending programmatic review. A full inspection was not conducted at this time. A copy of the Notice of Inspection Rights was provided at the time of the inspection. Please submit the Plan of Corrections via the LMS portal within 10 days of receipt of the Statement of Deficiencies. Ratios observed were: Infants: 1:1 Ones: 1:1 School-age:

  4. Aug 12, 20251 Finding1 Important
    • The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of the Annual Compliance Inspection Conducted on 08/12/2025 And…Compliance (Annual)

      The following deficiencies were observed at the time of the Annual Compliance Inspection conducted on 08/12/2025 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. A full inspection was conducted. Please submit the Plan of Corrections via the LMS portal within 10 days of receipt of the Statement of Deficiencies. A copy of the Notice of Inspection Rights was provided at the time of the inspection. The Emergency Disaster Contact form was discussed at the time of the inspection. Pleas

  5. Jul 16, 20251 Finding1 Important
    • No Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of the Modification Compliance Inspection Conducted on 7/16/25Modification

      No deficiencies were observed at the time of the Modification Compliance Inspection conducted on 7/16/25. This report is subject to changes pending programmatic review. A full inspection was not conducted. The requested room changes were approved. A copy of the Notice of Inspection Rights was provided at the time of the inspection. During the exit interview, the following items were discussed but are not limited to: Diaper-changing areas (dedicated counter-tops) - related items only,

  6. Oct 17, 20241 Finding1 Important
    • Compliance The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of the Initial Monitoring Compliance Inspection…Initial Monitoring

      Compliance The following deficiencies were observed at the time of the Initial Monitoring Compliance Inspection conducted on 10/17/24 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. A full inspection was not conducted. Please submit the Plan of Corrections via the LMS portal within 10 days of receipt of the Statement of Deficiencies. The fingerprint clearance cards for 6 of 6 staff members were verified to be valid through the DPS website at the time of the inspection. During

  7. Aug 14, 20241 Finding1 Important
    • The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of the Initial Compliance Inspection Conducted on 8/14/24 and Are…Compliance (Initial)

      The following deficiencies were observed at the time of the Initial Compliance Inspection conducted on 8/14/24 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. Please submit the Plan of Corrections via the LMS portal within 10 days of receipt of the Statement of Deficiencies. The Empower Self-Evaluation was discussed at the time of the inspection. The DES Contact form was discussed at the time of the inspection. The fingerprint clearance cards for 3 of 3 staff members were verif