Skip to main content
Childery

Yavapai In-Home Preschool

Data last updated · May 2026

Quality Indicators

See Methodology →
  • Overall Quality
    5 / 5
  • Process Quality
    Not Available
  • Structural Quality
    5 / 5

Why this rating

This daycare earned 5 out of 5 stars overall. Structural quality reflects a license in good standing. The structural rating also includes Arizona's licensing baseline — what every licensed daycare in the state must meet. Arizona caps infant ratios at 1:5, toddler ratios at 1:6, and preschool ratios at 1:15. Lead teachers must hold a High School Diploma. Teachers must complete 18 hours of annual training. No objective process measures (e.g., state quality rating or national accreditation) are available for this daycare. The overall rating reflects structural features only.

Quality Recognitions & Accreditations

Accreditations
  • National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)Not Accredited
  • National Accreditation Commission (NAC)Not Accredited
  • National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA)Not Accredited
  • National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)Not Accredited

Facility Info

Facility type
Group Child Care Home
Age groups served
Not Available
Licensed capacity
10
Teacher-child ratios & group sizesState Minimum Displayed
AgeMax ratioMax group
Infants1:5Not Regulated
Toddlers1:6Not Regulated
Preschool1:15Not Regulated

Teacher Credentials

Lead teacher credentialState Minimum Displayed
High School Diploma

Inspection History

7 Inspection Visits Since 2023 · 7 Findings
7 Important

Across 7 inspections since 2023, the issues cited most often were Licensing & Administrative Compliance (4), Staff Qualifications & Background Checks (2), and Staff-to-Child Ratios & Group Size (1). None of the 7 findings were critical.

See All 7 Inspection Visits
  1. Jan 8, 20261 Finding1 Important
    • The Following Deficiency Was Observed During the Annual Compliance Inspection Conducted on 1/08/2026, and Is Subject To…Compliance (Annual)

      The following deficiency was observed during the annual compliance inspection conducted on 1/08/2026, and is subject to change pending programmatic review. Please submit the Plan of Corrections through the Licensing Portal within 10 days of receipt of the Statement of Deficiencies. The Compliance Officer provided a copy of the Notice of Inspection Rights and the Small Business Bill of Rights at the time of the inspection. Two of two fingerprint clearance cards reviewed were valid throug

  2. Jul 8, 20251 Finding1 Important
    • There Were No Deficiencies Observed at the Time of the Mid-Year Inspection Conducted on 07/08/2025, and Are Subject To…Midyear

      There were no deficiencies observed at the time of the Mid-Year inspection conducted on 07/08/2025, and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. The fingerprint clearance cards for 2 of 2 staff/household members whose files were reviewed were verified to be valid through the DPS website at the time of the inspection.

  3. Jan 9, 20251 Finding1 Important
    • There Were No Deficiencies Observed at the Time of the Compliance Inspection on 01/09/2025 and Are Subject to Changes…Compliance (Annual)

      There were no deficiencies observed at the time of the Compliance Inspection on 01/09/2025 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. The Empower Self-Evaluation was emailed at the time of the inspection. The fingerprint cards for 2 of 2 staff/residents were verified to be valid through the DPS website at the time of the inspection. Compliance Officer Monika Jones

  4. Jul 15, 20241 Finding1 Important
    • No Deficiencies Were Observed During the Mid-year Inspection Conducted on July 15Midyear

      No deficiencies were observed during the mid-year inspection conducted on July 15, 2024, and are subject to change pending programmatic review. Compliance Officer #1: Stacy Marchelli Compliance Officer #2: Tara Farrell A full inspection was not conducted at this time. One fingerprint clearance card was verified through the DPS website during the inspection.

  5. Jan 17, 20241 Finding1 Important
    • The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of the Compliance Inspection Conducted on 1/17/24 and Are Subject…Compliance (Annual)

      The following deficiencies were observed at the time of the compliance inspection conducted on 1/17/24 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. Compliance Officer # 1: Brian Howell 2 of 2 Fingerprint clearance cards reviewed were valid via a DPS website search. The Empower Survey was completed online at the time of the inspection. The Written Document of Corrections is due within 10 days The following item is due within 10 days of receiving this document: A copy o

  6. Oct 25, 20231 Finding1 Important
    • The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of Complaint #00064330 Investigation Conducted on 10/25/23 and Are…Complaint

      The following deficiencies were observed at the time of Complaint #00064330 investigation conducted on 10/25/23 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. A telephone call was made to the Complainant on 10/25/23. Compliance Officer # 1: Brian Howell The Written Document of Corrections is due within 10 days A complete inspection of the facility was not conducted. The following ratio was observed: 2:12 Two staff members were interviewed during this investigation.

  7. Jul 19, 20231 Finding1 Important
    • The Following Deficiency Was Observed at the Time of the Midyear Compliance Inspection Conducted on 7/19/23 and Is…Midyear

      The following deficiency was observed at the time of the midyear compliance inspection conducted on 7/19/23 and is subject to changes pending programmatic review. Compliance Officer # 1: Brian Howell 2 of 2 Fingerprint clearance cards reviewed were valid via a DPS website search. The Written Document of Corrections is due within 10 days