Skip to main content
Childery

zinia zaman

Data last updated · May 2026

Quality Indicators

See Methodology →
  • Overall Quality
    5 / 5
  • Process Quality
    Not Available
  • Structural Quality
    5 / 5

Why this rating

This daycare earned 5 out of 5 stars overall. Structural quality reflects a license in good standing. The structural rating also includes Arizona's licensing baseline — what every licensed daycare in the state must meet. Arizona caps infant ratios at 1:5, toddler ratios at 1:6, and preschool ratios at 1:15. Lead teachers must hold a High School Diploma. Teachers must complete 18 hours of annual training. No objective process measures (e.g., state quality rating or national accreditation) are available for this daycare. The overall rating reflects structural features only.

Quality Recognitions & Accreditations

Accreditations
  • National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)Not Accredited
  • National Accreditation Commission (NAC)Not Accredited
  • National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA)Not Accredited
  • National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)Not Accredited

Facility Info

Facility type
Group Child Care Home
Age groups served
Not Available
Licensed capacity
10
Teacher-child ratios & group sizesState Minimum Displayed
AgeMax ratioMax group
Infants1:5Not Regulated
Toddlers1:6Not Regulated
Preschool1:15Not Regulated

Teacher Credentials

Lead teacher credentialState Minimum Displayed
High School Diploma

Inspection History

3 Inspection Visits Since 2025 · 3 Findings
3 Important

Across 3 inspections since 2025, the issues cited most often were Licensing & Administrative Compliance (2) and Staff Qualifications & Background Checks (1). None of the 3 findings were critical.

See All 3 Inspection Visits
  1. Jan 22, 20261 Finding1 Important
    • The Following Deficiencies Were Found During the Annual Compliance Inspection Conducted on 1/22/26, and Are Subject To…Compliance (Annual)

      The following deficiencies were found during the Annual Compliance inspection conducted on 1/22/26, and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. 2 of 2 fingerprint clearance cards reviewed were valid via a DPS website search. Please submit the Plan of Corrections on the Licensing portal within 10 days of receiving this Statement of Deficiencies. The following items were discussed, but not limited to: **Fire drill documentation. **Menu needs to be dated. **Floors are clea

  2. Mar 24, 20251 Finding1 Important
    • There Were No Deficiencies Observed at the Time of the Initial Monitoring Inspection Conducted on March 24, 2025,…Initial Monitoring

      There were no deficiencies observed at the time of the Initial Monitoring inspection conducted on March 24, 2025, subject to change pending programmatic review. A full inspection was conducted. Two of two fingerprint clearance cards reviewed were verified through the DPS website at the time of the inspection. The following was discussed, but not limited to: **Criminal History Affidavit forms are maintained in staff files. **Proof of CBC Background checks are maintained in staff files

  3. Jan 15, 20251 Finding1 Important
    • The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of the Initial Inspection Conducted on January 15, 2025, Subject…Compliance (Initial)

      The following deficiencies were observed at the time of the Initial inspection conducted on January 15, 2025, subject to changes pending programmatic review. Compliance Officer: Celeste Angulo Compliance Officer Supervisor: Peggy Kraus Please complete the Plan of Corrections on the Licensing portal within 10 days of receiving this Statement of Deficiencies. 2 of 2 fingerprint clearance cards reviewed were valid through the DPS website at the time of the inspection. The following ite