Skip to main content
Childery

Active Learning Center #8

Data last updated · May 2026

Quality Indicators

See Methodology →
  • Overall Quality
    4 / 5
  • Process Quality
    4 / 5
  • Structural Quality
    5 / 5

Why this rating

This daycare earned 4 out of 5 stars overall. Process quality reflects a Quality First rating of Level 4 (out of 5). Structural quality reflects a license in good standing. The structural rating also includes Arizona's licensing baseline — what every licensed daycare in the state must meet. Arizona caps infant ratios at 1:5, toddler ratios at 1:6, and preschool ratios at 1:15. Lead teachers must hold a High School Diploma. Teachers must complete 18 hours of annual training.

Quality Recognitions & Accreditations

State Quality Rating
Quality First Level 4 (Max 5) Learn more →
Accreditations
  • National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)Not Accredited
  • National Accreditation Commission (NAC)Not Accredited
  • National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA)Not Accredited
  • National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)Not Accredited

Facility Info

Facility type
Child Care Center
Age groups served
Infants, Toddlers, Preschool
Licensed capacity
91
Teacher-child ratios & group sizesState Minimum Displayed
AgeMax ratioMax group
Infants1:5Not Regulated
Toddlers1:6Not Regulated
Preschool1:15Not Regulated

Teacher Credentials

Lead teacher credentialState Minimum Displayed
High School Diploma

Inspection History

7 Inspection Visits Since 2024 · 7 Findings
7 Important

Across 7 inspections since 2024, the issues cited most often were Licensing & Administrative Compliance (5), Staff-to-Child Ratios & Group Size (1), and Staff Qualifications & Background Checks (1). None of the 7 findings were critical.

See All 7 Inspection Visits
  1. Feb 3, 20261 Finding1 Important
    • There Were No Deficiencies Observed at the Time of the Annual Compliance Inspection Conducted on 2/3/2026, but Are…Compliance (Annual)

      There were no deficiencies observed at the time of the Annual Compliance Inspection conducted on 2/3/2026, but are subject to changes pending programmatic review. A full inspection was conducted. A paper copy of the Notice of Inspection Rights was provided at the time of the inspection. The Emergency Disaster Contact form was completed at the time of the inspection. The DES Contract form was completed at the time of the inspection. The fingerprint clearance cards for 4 of 4 staff m

  2. Apr 17, 20251 Finding1 Important
    • The Purpose of This Inspection Was to Investigate a ComplaintComplaint

      The purpose of this inspection was to investigate a complaint. (4/17/25) A paper copy of the Notice of Inspection Rights was provided at the time of the inspection. A full inspection was not conducted. There were no deficiencies at the time of the complaint #00126285 investigation, and they are subject to change pending programmatic review. Ratios observed were: Infants: 2:9 1-year-old children: 1:6 2-year-old children: 2:9 3-year-old children: 1:13 4- & 5-year-old children: 1:13

  3. Feb 7, 20251 Finding1 Important
    • There Were No Deficiencies Observed at the Time of the Compliance Inspection Conducted on 2/7/2025, and They Are…Compliance (Annual)

      There were no deficiencies observed at the time of the Compliance Inspection conducted on 2/7/2025, and they are subject to changes pending programmatic review. A paper copy of the Notice of Inspection Rights was provided at the time of the inspection. The Emergency Disaster Contact form was completed at the time of the inspection. The DES Group Size contact form was completed at the time of the inspection. The Empower Self-Survey was emailed to the program. Please complete it within

  4. Oct 28, 20241 Finding1 Important
    • There Were No Deficiencies Observed at the Time of the Complaint #00091443 Investigation Conducted on 10/28/2024Complaint

      There were no deficiencies observed at the time of the Complaint #00091443 Investigation conducted on 10/28/2024. This report is subject to changes pending programmatic review. A full inspection was not conducted at this time. Ratios observed were: Infants: 1:5 1-year-olds: 2:10 2-year-olds: 2:11 3-year-olds: 1:7 4-year-olds: 1:12 There were 3 staff interviewed during this investigation. There was 1 staff file reviewed during this investigation. The documentation reviewed: Emer

  5. Jun 7, 20241 Finding1 Important
    • No Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of the Complaint Investigation Conducted on 6/7/2024 for Case # 00083466Complaint

      No deficiencies were observed at the time of the complaint investigation conducted on 6/7/2024 for case # 00083466. This report is subject to changes pending programmatic review. A full inspection was not conducted at this time. Ratios observed were: Infant : 1:3 1-year-old children: 1:6 2-year-old-children: 2:7 School-age children: 2:21 There were 2 staff interviewed during this inspection. The Compliance Officer communicated with the complainant via email on 5/20/2024. Upo

  6. Apr 23, 20241 Finding1 Important
    • The Purpose of the Inspection Was to Conduct a Complaint InvestigationComplaint

      The purpose of the inspection was to conduct a complaint investigation. A full inspection was not conducted at this time. Ratios observed were: Infants: 2:6 1-year-olds: 1:4 1-year-olds: 1:5 2-year-olds: 2:11 3-year-olds: 1:9 4-year-olds: 1:10 There were 3 staff interviewed during this inspection. Others interviewed: Director. The Compliance Officer contacted and spoke with the complainant via telephone on 3/22/2024. Documentation reviewed included: *Emergency, Informatio

  7. Feb 12, 20241 Finding1 Important
    • The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of the Compliance Inspection Conducted on 2/12/2024 and Are…Compliance (Annual)

      The following deficiencies were observed at the time of the Compliance Inspection conducted on 2/12/2024 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. Please submit the Plan of Corrections via the LMS portal within 10 days of receipt of the Statement of Deficiencies. The Emergency Disaster Contact form was completed at the time of the inspection. The Empower Self-Evaluation was completed at the time of the inspection. The DES Contact form was completed at the time of the i