Amigo Preschools #2
Data last updated · May 2026
Quality Indicators
See Methodology →- Overall QualityCombines daily care quality (interactions, learning, environment) with structural features like staff-to-child ratios and teacher qualifications.5 / 5
- Process QualityThe quality of daily care — caregiver-child interactions, learning activities, and the emotional climate. Drawn from the state QRIS rating, accreditations, and Head Start CLASS observations.Not Available
- Structural QualityMeasurable features like staff-to-child ratios, group sizes, license status, and teacher qualifications. Provider-level data when available; otherwise the state regulatory baseline.5 / 5
Why this rating
This daycare earned 5 out of 5 stars overall. Structural quality reflects a license in good standing. The structural rating also includes Arizona's licensing baseline — what every licensed daycare in the state must meet. Arizona caps infant ratios at 1:5, toddler ratios at 1:6, and preschool ratios at 1:15. Lead teachers must hold a High School Diploma. Teachers must complete 18 hours of annual training. No objective process measures (e.g., state quality rating or national accreditation) are available for this daycare. The overall rating reflects structural features only.
Quality Recognitions & Accreditations
- Accreditations
- National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)Not Accredited
- National Accreditation Commission (NAC)Not Accredited
- National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA)Not Accredited
- National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)Not Accredited
Facility Info
- Facility type
- Child Care Center
- Age groups served
- Not Available
- Licensed capacity
- 140
- Teacher-child ratios & group sizesState Minimum Displayed
Age Max ratio Max group Infants 1:5 Not Regulated Toddlers 1:6 Not Regulated Preschool 1:15 Not Regulated
Teacher Credentials
- Lead teacher credentialState Minimum Displayed
- High School Diploma
Inspection History
Across 5 inspections since 2023, the issues cited most often were Licensing & Administrative Compliance (5). None of the 5 findings were critical.
See All 5 Inspection Visits
Jul 31, 20251 Finding1 Important
- The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of the Annual Compliance Inspection Conducted on 7/31/2025, And…Compliance (Annual)
The following deficiencies were observed at the time of the Annual Compliance Inspection conducted on 7/31/2025, and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. A Plan of Corrections will not be accepted at this time. Two of three Fingerprint Clearance Cards were verified as valid via the DPS website. One of three Fingerprint Clearance Cards were verified as invalid. The following was discussed, but not limited to: *Individualized Plan is obtained for any child with special nee
Aug 22, 20241 Finding1 Important
- The Following Deficiencies Were Observed During the Compliance Inspection Conducted on August 2Compliance (Annual)
The following deficiencies were observed during the compliance inspection conducted on August 2, 2024, and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. Compliance Officer #1: Stacy Marchelli Compliance Officer #2: AuReyon Thompson A complete inspection was conducted at this time. The fingerprint clearance cards for 4 of 4 staff members were verified to be valid through the DPS website at the time of the inspection.
Jul 15, 20241 Finding1 Important
- AMENDED August 21Complaint
AMENDED August 21, 2024 for 501.C.1 The purpose of the inspection was to investigate complaint #87120 on July 15, 2024. A complete inspection was not conducted. Compliance Officer #1: Stacy Marchelli Compliance Officer #2: Tara Farrell The ratios observed were: Infants 1:5 1's 1:7 2's 1:9 3's 1:12 Pre-K 2:22 School-age 2:24 Two staff members were interviewed during this investigation. Others interviewed: The Compliance Officer emailed the complainant for complaint 8712
Mar 22, 20241 Finding1 Important
- The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of Complaint #Investigation Conducted on 3/22/24 and Are Subject…Complaint
The following deficiencies were observed at the time of Complaint #investigation conducted on 3/22/24 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. A telephone call was made to the Complainant on 3/22/24. Compliance Officer # 1: Brian Howell Compliance Officer # 2: Archana Navin The Written Document of Corrections is due within 10 days A complete inspection of the facility was not conducted. The following classroom ratios were observed: Infants: 1:5 Ones/Twos: 2:11
Aug 25, 20231 Finding1 Important
- The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of the Compliance Inspection Conducted on 8/25/23 and Are Subject…Compliance (Annual)
The following deficiencies were observed at the time of the compliance inspection conducted on 8/25/23 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. Compliance Officer # 1: Brian Howell Compliance Officer # 2: Archana Navin 4 of 4 Fingerprint clearance cards reviewed were valid via a DPS website search. The Written Document of Corrections will not be accepted at this time. The following item is due within 10 days of receiving this document: A copy of the current violatio