Bright Kids Academy
Data last updated · May 2026
Quality Indicators
See Methodology →- Overall QualityCombines daily care quality (interactions, learning, environment) with structural features like staff-to-child ratios and teacher qualifications.5 / 5
- Process QualityThe quality of daily care — caregiver-child interactions, learning activities, and the emotional climate. Drawn from the state QRIS rating, accreditations, and Head Start CLASS observations.5 / 5
- Structural QualityMeasurable features like staff-to-child ratios, group sizes, license status, and teacher qualifications. Provider-level data when available; otherwise the state regulatory baseline.4 / 5
Why this rating
This daycare earned 5 out of 5 stars overall. Process quality reflects a Child Care Quality System rating of Default Foundation of Quality and NAEYC accreditation. Structural quality reflects Utah's licensing baseline. Utah caps infant ratios at 1:4, toddler ratios at 1:5, and preschool ratios at 1:15. Lead-teacher education isn't regulated. Teachers must complete 20 hours of annual training.
Quality Recognitions & Accreditations
- State Quality Rating
- Child Care Quality System Default Foundation of Quality Learn more →
- Accreditations
- National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)Accredited
- National Accreditation Commission (NAC)Not Accredited
- National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA)Not Accredited
- National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)Not Accredited
Facility Info
- Facility type
- Daycare
- Age groups served
- Infants, Toddlers, School-Age
- Licensed capacity
- Not Available
- Teacher-child ratios & group sizesState Minimum Displayed
Age Max ratio Max group Infants 1:4 8 Toddlers 1:5 10
Teacher Credentials
- Lead teacher credentialState Minimum Displayed
- Not Regulated
Inspection History
Across 2 inspections since 2025, the issues cited most often were Staff Qualifications & Background Checks (3) and Staff-to-Child Ratios & Group Size (2). None of the 5 findings were critical.
See All 2 Inspection Visits
Nov 24, 20252 Findings2 Important
- The Provider Was Out of Compliance with Rule R381-100-10(1)(a) by Not Ensuring the Single-age Group Had the Required…R381-100-10(1)(a)-(c)
The provider was out of compliance with rule R381-100-10(1)(a) by not ensuring the single-age group had the required caregivers. During the inspection, the infant room had six infants total between two rooms with one caregiver present. This is a repeat citation as previously notes on November 03,
- The Provider Was Out of Compliance with Rule R381-100-11(1)(a) by Not Ensuring Active Supervision and Remaining…R381-100-11(1)(a)-(g)
The provider was out of compliance with Rule R381-100-11(1)(a) by not ensuring active supervision and remaining physically present in the room with the children. During the inspection, four infants were sleeping in a room with the door closed without a staff physically present in the room. This is
Nov 3, 20253 Findings3 Important
- The Provider Was Out of Compliance with Rule R381-100-10(1)(a)-(c) by Not Ensuring the Single-age Group Had The…R381-100-10(1)(a)-(c)
The provider was out of compliance with rule R381-100-10(1)(a)-(c) by not ensuring the single-age group had the required caregivers, not exceeding the maximum group size, and to not exceed the number of children in the caregiver-to-child ratio. In the infant room, there were 6 infants and young todd
- The Provider Was Out of Compliance with Rule R381-100-11(1)(a) by Not Ensuring That Each Caregiver Maintains Active…R381-100-11(1)(a)-(g)
The provider was out of compliance with rule R381-100-11(1)(a) by not ensuring that each caregiver maintains active supervision of each child by being physically present in the classroom. In the nap room, there was a sleeping infant without a caregiver physically present in the room. In the infant r
- The Provider Was Out of Compliance with Rule R381-100-8(2)(d) by Allowing a Covered Individual to Become Involved With…R381-100-8(2)(a)-(c)
The provider was out of compliance with rule R381-100-8(2)(d) by allowing a covered individual to become involved with childcare before an eligible background check was received. In the 3-5 room, there was a covered individual without an eligible background check involved with childcare. This was a