Skip to main content
Childery

Generation Church Daycare

Data last updated · May 2026

Quality Indicators

See Methodology →
  • Overall Quality
    5 / 5
  • Process Quality
    Not Available
  • Structural Quality
    5 / 5

Why this rating

This daycare earned 5 out of 5 stars overall. Structural quality reflects a license in good standing. The structural rating also includes Arizona's licensing baseline — what every licensed daycare in the state must meet. Arizona caps infant ratios at 1:5, toddler ratios at 1:6, and preschool ratios at 1:15. Lead teachers must hold a High School Diploma. Teachers must complete 18 hours of annual training. No objective process measures (e.g., state quality rating or national accreditation) are available for this daycare. The overall rating reflects structural features only.

Quality Recognitions & Accreditations

Accreditations
  • National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)Not Accredited
  • National Accreditation Commission (NAC)Not Accredited
  • National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA)Not Accredited
  • National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)Not Accredited

Facility Info

Facility type
Child Care Center
Age groups served
Not Available
Licensed capacity
96
Teacher-child ratios & group sizesState Minimum Displayed
AgeMax ratioMax group
Infants1:5Not Regulated
Toddlers1:6Not Regulated
Preschool1:15Not Regulated

Teacher Credentials

Lead teacher credentialState Minimum Displayed
High School Diploma

Inspection History

7 Inspection Visits Since 2023 · 7 Findings
7 Important

Across 7 inspections since 2023, the issues cited most often were Licensing & Administrative Compliance (6) and Staff Qualifications & Background Checks (1). None of the 7 findings were critical.

See All 7 Inspection Visits
  1. Dec 11, 20251 Finding1 Important
    • The Purpose of the Inspection Was to Conduct a Complaint Investigation #00151789 on 12.11.25Complaint

      The purpose of the inspection was to conduct a Complaint investigation #00151789 on 12.11.25. A full inspection was not conducted. The following deficiencies were observed and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. The Compliance Officer provided a paper copy of the Notice of Inspection Rights and the Small Business Bill of Rights to the Facility Director at the time of the inspection. Please submit the Plan of Corrections via the LMS portal within 10 days of receipt of this

  2. Jul 29, 20251 Finding1 Important
    • The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of the Monitoring Inspection Conducted on 07.29.25, and Are…Monitoring

      The following deficiencies were observed at the time of the Monitoring inspection conducted on 07.29.25, and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. A full inspection was not conducted at this time. The Compliance Officer provided a paper copy of the Notice of Inspection Rights and the Small Business Bill of Rights to the facility Director at the time of the inspection. A plan of correction is not being accepted at this time. The Empower self-evaluation was emailed to t

  3. Jul 14, 20251 Finding1 Important
    • The Purpose of the Inspection Was to Conduct a Complaint Investigation 0135933 on 07.14.25Complaint Compliance (Annual)

      The purpose of the inspection was to conduct a complaint investigation 0135933 on 07.14.25. A full inspection was not conducted at this time. A Plan of Correction will not be accepted at this time. The Compliance Officer provided a paper copy of the Notice of Inspection Rights to the facility Director at the time of the inspection. Ratios observed were as follows: Room 105 (Infants): 2:3 Room 106 (Toddlers): 3:1 Room 107( 3-5 yo): 6:2 Room 101(School Age): 6:2 Chapel (School Age)

  4. Jul 23, 20241 Finding1 Important
    • The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of the Compliance Inspection Conducted on 07/23/2024 Subject To…Compliance (Annual)

      The following deficiencies were observed at the time of the Compliance inspection conducted on 07/23/2024 subject to changes pending programmatic review. Compliance Officer (CO) #1: Pat Morgan-Martinez Compliance Officer (CO) #2: Stephanie Jake Please submit the Written Documentation of Corrections via the Licensing portal within 10 days of receipt of the Statement of Deficiencies. 5 of 5 fingerprint clearance cards were valid via a DPS website search. The Empower Survey link was

  5. Dec 19, 20231 Finding1 Important
    • There Were No Deficiencies Found at the Time of the Modification Inspection Conducted on 12/19/2023Modification

      There were no deficiencies found at the time of the Modification inspection conducted on 12/19/2023. Compliance Officer: David Ramos The resilient surface on the Preschool outdoor activity area was approved for use at this time.

  6. Sep 1, 20231 Finding1 Important
    • There Were No Deficiencies Found at the Time of the Vehicle Inspection Conducted on 9/1/2023Change of Service

      There were no deficiencies found at the time of the vehicle inspection conducted on 9/1/2023. Compliance Officer: David Ramos Transportation services were approved at this time.

  7. Jul 26, 20231 Finding1 Important
    • The Following Deficiencies Were Found at the Time of the Compliance Inspection Conducted on 7/26/2023 and Are Subject…Compliance (Annual)

      The following deficiencies were found at the time of the Compliance inspection conducted on 7/26/2023 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. Compliance Officer #1: David Ramos Compliance Officer #2: Jennifer Forschino Compliance Officer #2 reviewed 4 staff files. The fingerprint clearance cards for 4 of the 4 staff members were verified to be valid through the DPS website at the time of the inspection. The Empower survey was completed at the time of the inspection.