Kids Haven Child Care & Preschool
Data last updated · May 2026
Quality Indicators
See Methodology →- Overall QualityCombines daily care quality (interactions, learning, environment) with structural features like staff-to-child ratios and teacher qualifications.4 / 5
- Process QualityThe quality of daily care — caregiver-child interactions, learning activities, and the emotional climate. Drawn from the state QRIS rating, accreditations, and Head Start CLASS observations.3 / 5
- Structural QualityMeasurable features like staff-to-child ratios, group sizes, license status, and teacher qualifications. Provider-level data when available; otherwise the state regulatory baseline.5 / 5
Why this rating
This daycare earned 4 out of 5 stars overall. Process quality reflects a Quality First rating of Level 3 (out of 5). Structural quality reflects a license in good standing. The structural rating also includes Arizona's licensing baseline — what every licensed daycare in the state must meet. Arizona caps infant ratios at 1:5, toddler ratios at 1:6, and preschool ratios at 1:15. Lead teachers must hold a High School Diploma. Teachers must complete 18 hours of annual training.
Quality Recognitions & Accreditations
- State Quality Rating
- Quality First Level 3 (Max 5) Learn more →
- Accreditations
- National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)Not Accredited
- National Accreditation Commission (NAC)Not Accredited
- National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA)Not Accredited
- National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)Not Accredited
Facility Info
- Facility type
- Child Care Center
- Age groups served
- Infants, Toddlers, Preschool
- Licensed capacity
- 59
- Teacher-child ratios & group sizesState Minimum Displayed
Age Max ratio Max group Infants 1:5 Not Regulated Toddlers 1:6 Not Regulated Preschool 1:15 Not Regulated
Teacher Credentials
- Lead teacher credentialState Minimum Displayed
- High School Diploma
Inspection History
Across 7 inspections since 2023, the issues cited most often were Licensing & Administrative Compliance (6) and Staff Qualifications & Background Checks (1). None of the 7 findings were critical.
See All 7 Inspection Visits
Jun 9, 20251 Finding1 Important
- The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of the Compliance Inspection Conducted on 6/9/2025 and Are Subject…Compliance (Annual)
The following deficiencies were observed at the time of the Compliance Inspection conducted on 6/9/2025 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. Please submit the Plan of Corrections via the LMS portal within 10 days of receipt of the Statement of Deficiencies. The Compliance Officer provided the facility with a paper copy of the Notice of Inspection Rights at the start of the inspection. The DES Contact Group size was in compliance at the time of the inspection. The f
Jul 11, 20241 Finding1 Important
- The Purpose of the 07/11/2024 Monitoring Inspection Was to Conduct a Vehicle Inspection on the Chevy Express 2500 VanMonitoring
The purpose of the 07/11/2024 Monitoring Inspection was to conduct a vehicle inspection on the Chevy Express 2500 Van. AZ license plate CHX-8499. There were no deficiencies found at the time of the inspection. The Compliance Officer is Dawn Rathburn.
Jun 19, 20241 Finding1 Important
- The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of the Compliance Inspection Conducted on 6/19/2024 and Are…Compliance (Annual)
The following deficiencies were observed at the time of the Compliance Inspection conducted on 6/19/2024 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. Please submit the Plan of Corrections via the LMS portal within 10 days of receipt of the Statement of Deficiencies. The director will email the Emergency Disaster Contact form. The fingerprint clearance cards for 6 of 6 staff members were verified to be valid through the DPS website at the time of the inspection. During the
Mar 1, 20241 Finding1 Important
- AMENDED 3/28/24 (R9-5-401.3) The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of Complaint #00078444…Complaint
AMENDED 3/28/24 (R9-5-401.3) The following deficiencies were observed at the time of Complaint #00078444 investigation conducted on 3/1/24 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. A telephone call was made to the Complainant on 3/1/24. Compliance Officer # 1: Brian Howell Compliance Officer # 2: Archana Navin The Written Document of Corrections is due within 10 days A complete inspection of the facility was not conducted. The following classroom ratios were obse
Feb 21, 20241 Finding1 Important
- The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of Complaint #00078589 Investigation Conducted on 2/21/24 and Are…Complaint
The following deficiencies were observed at the time of Complaint #00078589 investigation conducted on 2/21/24 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. A telephone call was made to the Complainant on 2/21/24. Compliance Officer # 1: Brian Howell The Written Document of Corrections is due within 10 days A complete inspection of the facility was not conducted. The following classroom ratios were observed: Infants: 2:7 Ones/Twos: 2:8 Threes/Fours/Fives: 0:8 Schoo
Jul 20, 20231 Finding1 Important
- There Were No Deficiencies Observed at the Time of the Modification Inspection Conducted on 7/20/2023Modification
There were no deficiencies observed at the time of the modification inspection conducted on 7/20/2023. Compliance Officer: David Ramos The reduction of capacity in the Infant room from 10 to 5 was approved at this time.
Jun 23, 20231 Finding1 Important
- The Following Deficiencies Were Found at the Time of the Compliance Inspection Conducted on 6/23/2023 and Are Subject…Compliance (Annual)
The following deficiencies were found at the time of the Compliance inspection conducted on 6/23/2023 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. Compliance Officer #1: David Ramos Compliance Officer #2: Sherri Pavlisick Compliance Officer #2 reviewed 4 staff files. The fingerprint clearance cards for 4 of the 4 staff members were verified to be valid through the DPS website at the time of the inspection. The Empower survey was completed at the time of the inspection. Pl