Skip to main content
Childery

La Petite Academy Preschool

Data last updated · May 2026

Quality Indicators

See Methodology →
  • Overall Quality
    4 / 5
  • Process Quality
    3 / 5
  • Structural Quality
    5 / 5

Why this rating

This daycare earned 4 out of 5 stars overall. Process quality reflects a Quality First rating of Level 3 (out of 5). Structural quality reflects a license in good standing. The structural rating also includes Arizona's licensing baseline — what every licensed daycare in the state must meet. Arizona caps infant ratios at 1:5, toddler ratios at 1:6, and preschool ratios at 1:15. Lead teachers must hold a High School Diploma. Teachers must complete 18 hours of annual training.

Quality Recognitions & Accreditations

State Quality Rating
Quality First Level 3 (Max 5) Learn more →
Accreditations
  • National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)Not Accredited
  • National Accreditation Commission (NAC)Not Accredited
  • National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA)Not Accredited
  • National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)Not Accredited

Facility Info

Facility type
Child Care Center
Age groups served
Infants, Toddlers, Preschool
Licensed capacity
203
Teacher-child ratios & group sizesState Minimum Displayed
AgeMax ratioMax group
Infants1:5Not Regulated
Toddlers1:6Not Regulated
Preschool1:15Not Regulated

Teacher Credentials

Lead teacher credentialState Minimum Displayed
High School Diploma

Inspection History

7 Inspection Visits Since 2023 · 7 Findings
7 Important

Across 7 inspections since 2023, the issues cited most often were Licensing & Administrative Compliance (5), Staff-to-Child Ratios & Group Size (1), and Staff Qualifications & Background Checks (1). None of the 7 findings were critical.

See All 7 Inspection Visits
  1. Dec 8, 20251 Finding1 Important
    • The Purpose of the Inspection Was to Conduct Complaint #00152101 and #00152107 Investigation on 12/8/2025Complaint

      The purpose of the inspection was to conduct complaint #00152101 and #00152107 investigation on 12/8/2025. A full inspection was not conducted at this time. Ratios observed were: Infants:2:6 1-year-old children:1:3 2-year-old children:2:15 3 and 4-year-old children:1:13 4 and 5-year-old children:1:14 There were 4 staff members interviewed during this investigation. Documentation observed was: Rosters and Incident reports Upon completion of the complaint #00152101 and #00152107

  2. Jul 10, 20251 Finding1 Important
    • The Purpose of the Inspection Was to Conduct a Compliance Inspection and Complaint InvestigationComplaint Compliance (Annual)

      The purpose of the inspection was to conduct a Compliance Inspection and complaint investigation. The following deficiencies were observed at the time of complaint #00134683 investigation conducted on 7/10/2025 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. A Plan of Corrections will not be accepted at this time. The fingerprint clearance cards for 5 of 5 staff members were verified to be valid through the DPS website at the time of the inspection. Ratios observed were: I

  3. May 6, 20251 Finding1 Important
    • The Purpose of the Inspection Was to Conduct a Complaint InvestigationComplaint

      The purpose of the inspection was to conduct a complaint investigation. A full inspection was not conducted at this time. There were no deficiencies observed at the time of complaint #00129422 investigation conducted on 5/6/2025 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. Ratios observed were: Infants: 2:6 1-year-old children: 1:6 2-year-old children: 1:6 2/3-year-old children: 2:10 3-year-old children: 1:13 4/5-year-old children:1:15 There were 3 staff interview

  4. Oct 4, 20241 Finding1 Important
    • The Purpose of the Inspection Was to Conduct a Complaint InvestigationComplaint

      The purpose of the inspection was to conduct a complaint investigation. A full inspection was not conducted at this time. The following deficiencies were observed at the time of complaint #00091036 investigation conducted on 10/4/2024 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. A Plan of Corrections will not be accepted at this time. Ratios observed were: Infants: 2:5 1-year-old children: 2:5 and 1:6 2-year-old children: 3:17 3 and 4-year-old children: 3:21 Schoo

  5. Jul 16, 20241 Finding1 Important
    • The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of the Compliance Inspection Conducted on 7/16/2024 and Are…Compliance (Annual)

      The following deficiencies were observed at the time of the Compliance Inspection conducted on 7/16/2024 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. A Plan of Correction will not be accepted at this time. The Emergency Disaster Contact form was completed at the time of the inspection. The Empower Self-Evaluation was completed at the time of the inspection. The DES Group Size Checklist form was completed at the time of the inspection. The fingerprint clearance cards for

  6. Jun 11, 20241 Finding1 Important
    • There Were No Deficiencies Observed at the Time of the Complaint #00085671 Investigation Conducted on 6/11/2024Complaint

      There were no deficiencies observed at the time of the complaint #00085671 investigation conducted on 6/11/2024. A full inspection was not conducted at this time. The Ratios observed were: Infants: 2:5 1-year-old children: 1:6; 1:6 2-year-old children: 2:15 3-year-old children: 1:12 4&5-year-old children: 1:11 School-Ace children: 1:7 There were 2 staff interviewed during this investigation. There were 3 staff files reviewed during this investigation. Documents reviewed: Accident/

  7. Jul 21, 20231 Finding1 Important
    • The Following Deficiencies Were Observed During the Compliance Inspection Conducted on 07/21/2023, and Are Subject To…Compliance (Annual)

      The following deficiencies were observed during the Compliance Inspection conducted on 07/21/2023, and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. Please submit the Plan of Corrections via the LMS portal within 10 days of receipt of the Statement of Deficiencies. The fingerprint clearance cards for 7 of 7 staff members were verified through the DPS website at the time of the inspection. During the exit interview, the following items were discussed but are not limited to: *Final