Skip to main content
Childery

Lifeprints Childcare

Data last updated · May 2026

Quality Indicators

See Methodology →
  • Overall Quality
    4 / 5
  • Process Quality
    4 / 5
  • Structural Quality
    5 / 5

Why this rating

This daycare earned 4 out of 5 stars overall. Process quality reflects a Quality First rating of Level 4 (out of 5). Structural quality reflects a license in good standing. The structural rating also includes Arizona's licensing baseline — what every licensed daycare in the state must meet. Arizona caps infant ratios at 1:5, toddler ratios at 1:6, and preschool ratios at 1:15. Lead teachers must hold a High School Diploma. Teachers must complete 18 hours of annual training.

Quality Recognitions & Accreditations

State Quality Rating
Quality First Level 4 (Max 5) Learn more →
Accreditations
  • National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)Not Accredited
  • National Accreditation Commission (NAC)Not Accredited
  • National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA)Not Accredited
  • National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)Not Accredited

Facility Info

Facility type
Child Care Center
Age groups served
Infants, Toddlers, Preschool
Licensed capacity
125
Teacher-child ratios & group sizesState Minimum Displayed
AgeMax ratioMax group
Infants1:5Not Regulated
Toddlers1:6Not Regulated
Preschool1:15Not Regulated

Teacher Credentials

Lead teacher credentialState Minimum Displayed
High School Diploma

Inspection History

6 Inspection Visits Since 2023 · 6 Findings
6 Important

Across 6 inspections since 2023, the issues cited most often were Licensing & Administrative Compliance (4), Staff Qualifications & Background Checks (1), and Staff-to-Child Ratios & Group Size (1). None of the 6 findings were critical.

See All 6 Inspection Visits
  1. May 8, 20261 Finding1 Important
    • There Were No Deficiencies at the Time of Complaint #00167719 Investigation Conducted on 5/8/26Complaint

      There were no deficiencies at the time of Complaint #00167719 investigation conducted on 5/8/26. A telephone call was made to the Complainant on 5/8/26 An email was sent to the Complainant on 5/8/26. A focused inspection was conducted. The following classroom ratios were observed: Infants: 1:5 Ones: 1:5 Twos: 2:11 Threes/Fours/Fives: 1:12 Three staff members were interviewed during this investigation. One staff file was reviewed during this investigation. The following do

  2. Jul 22, 20251 Finding1 Important
    • There Were No Deficiencies at the Time of Complaint #00137085 Investigation Conducted on 7/22/25Complaint

      There were no deficiencies at the time of Complaint #00137085 investigation conducted on 7/22/25. A telephone call was made to the Complainant on 7/22/25. A complete inspection of the facility was not conducted. The following classroom ratios were observed: Infants: 1:4 Ones: 1:2 Twos: 1:5 Threes: 1:11 Fours/Fives: 1:10 Two staff members were interviewed during this investigation. The following documentation was reviewed: Classroom rosters Upon completion of the compla

  3. May 16, 20251 Finding1 Important
    • The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of the Compliance Inspection Conducted on 5/16/25 and Are Subject…Compliance (Annual)

      The following deficiencies were observed at the time of the compliance inspection conducted on 5/16/25 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. 4 of 4 Fingerprint clearance cards reviewed were valid via a DPS website search. The Written Document of Corrections is due within 10 days

  4. May 20, 20241 Finding1 Important
    • The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of the Compliance Inspection Conducted on 5/20/2024 and Are…Compliance (Annual)

      The following deficiencies were observed at the time of the Compliance inspection conducted on 5/20/2024 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. Please submit the Written Documentation of Corrections within 10 days of receipt of this Statement of Deficiencies. 4 of 4 Fingerprint clearance cards reviewed were valid via a DPS website search. The Empower Survey was completed online at the time of the inspection. Compliance Officer #1: Archana Navin Compliance Officer #2

  5. Oct 19, 20231 Finding1 Important
    • The Purpose of the Inspection Was to Conduct a Complaint InvestigationComplaint

      The purpose of the inspection was to conduct a complaint investigation. A full inspection was not conducted at this time. The Plan of Corrections will not be accepted at this time. Ratios observed were: Infants: 1:1 1/2-year-old children: 1:2 3/4-year-old children: 1:6 There were 3 staff interviewed during this investigation. There were 5 staff files reviewed during this investigation. Others interviewed: Director Documentation observed included rosters, diaper logs, staf

  6. Sep 28, 20231 Finding1 Important
    • The Purpose of the Inspection Was to Conduct Complaint Investigation 63506 on 09/28/2023 and Are Subject to Changes…Complaint

      The purpose of the inspection was to conduct Complaint investigation 63506 on 09/28/2023 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. A full inspection was not conducted at this time. Please submit the Plan of Corrections via the LMS portal within 10 days of receipt of this Statement of Deficiencies. Ratios observed were: Infants- 1:1 1's-5's- 1: 3's-5's-1: There were 4 staff interviewed during this investigation. Others interviewed: Complainant for Complaint #63506