New Beginnings Preschool
Data last updated · May 2026
Quality Indicators
See Methodology →- Overall QualityCombines daily care quality (interactions, learning, environment) with structural features like staff-to-child ratios and teacher qualifications.4 / 5
- Process QualityThe quality of daily care — caregiver-child interactions, learning activities, and the emotional climate. Drawn from the state QRIS rating, accreditations, and Head Start CLASS observations.4 / 5
- Structural QualityMeasurable features like staff-to-child ratios, group sizes, license status, and teacher qualifications. Provider-level data when available; otherwise the state regulatory baseline.5 / 5
Why this rating
This daycare earned 4 out of 5 stars overall. Process quality reflects a Quality First rating of Level 4 (out of 5). Structural quality reflects a license in good standing. The structural rating also includes Arizona's licensing baseline — what every licensed daycare in the state must meet. Arizona caps infant ratios at 1:5, toddler ratios at 1:6, and preschool ratios at 1:15. Lead teachers must hold a High School Diploma. Teachers must complete 18 hours of annual training.
Quality Recognitions & Accreditations
- State Quality Rating
- Quality First Level 4 (Max 5) Learn more →
- Accreditations
- National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)Not Accredited
- National Accreditation Commission (NAC)Not Accredited
- National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA)Not Accredited
- National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)Not Accredited
Facility Info
- Facility type
- Child Care Center
- Age groups served
- Infants, Toddlers, Preschool
- Licensed capacity
- 150
- Teacher-child ratios & group sizesState Minimum Displayed
Age Max ratio Max group Infants 1:5 Not Regulated Toddlers 1:6 Not Regulated Preschool 1:15 Not Regulated
Teacher Credentials
- Lead teacher credentialState Minimum Displayed
- High School Diploma
Inspection History
Across 6 inspections since 2023, the issues cited most often were Licensing & Administrative Compliance (5) and Staff Qualifications & Background Checks (1). None of the 6 findings were critical.
See All 6 Inspection Visits
Dec 17, 20251 Finding1 Important
- The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of the Annual Inspection Conducted on 12.15.25, and Are Subject To…Compliance (Annual)
The following deficiencies were observed at the time of the annual inspection conducted on 12.15.25, and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. The Compliance Officer provided a paper copy of the Notice of Inspection Rights and the Small Bill of Rights to the facility director at the time of the inspection. A link to the Empower Self-Evaluation was sent to the facility director. The Emergency Disaster Plan update form was completed at the time of the inspection. Five finge
Dec 19, 20241 Finding1 Important
- The Following Deficiencies Were Found at the Time of the Compliance Inspection Conducted on 12/19/2024, and Are Subject…Compliance (Annual)
The following deficiencies were found at the time of the Compliance Inspection conducted on 12/19/2024, and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. Compliance Officer #1: Chloe-James Rossi Compliance Officer #2: Pat Morgan-Martinez The Plan of Corrections will not be accepted at this time. The following was discussed but is not limited to: *Ensure the facility is maintained in a clean and sanitized condition; *Ensure outdoor toys are free from hazards; *Ensure the so
Nov 19, 20241 Finding1 Important
- The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of the Complaint Investigation (Case#92360) Conducted On…Complaint
The following deficiencies were observed at the time of the Complaint investigation (Case#92360) conducted on 11/19/2024 and are subject to change pending programmatic review. The investigation was completed on 11/19/2024. Compliance Officer (CO) #1: Pat Morgan-Martinez Compliance Officer (CO) #2: Fred Geyser A full inspection was not conducted at this time. The Complainant was contacted on 11/18/2024. A Plan of Corrections will not be accepted at this time. Ratios observed were
Jun 21, 20241 Finding1 Important
- The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of Complaint # 00085999 Investigation Conducted on 6/20/2024 And…Complaint
The following deficiencies were observed at the time of complaint # 00085999 investigation conducted on 6/20/2024 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. A full inspection was not conducted at this time. Pleas submit the Plan of Corrections via the LMS portal within 10 days of receipt of the Statement of Deficiencies. Ratios observed were: Infants: 1:4 1-year-old children: 1:5 2-year-old children: 1:7 3-year-old children: 1:9 4-year-old children: 1:14 School-Age
Jan 3, 20241 Finding1 Important
- The Following Deficiencies Were Found During the Compliance Inspection Conducted on 1/3/2024 and Are Subject to Changes…Compliance (Annual)
The following deficiencies were found during the Compliance inspection conducted on 1/3/2024 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. Compliance Officer: David Ramos The Compliance Officer reviewed 7 staff files. The fingerprint clearance cards for 6 of the 6 staff members were verified to be valid through the DPS website at the time of the inspection. The Empower survey was completed at the time of the inspection. During the exit interview, the following items were di
Oct 4, 20231 Finding1 Important
- The Purpose of the Inspection Was to Conduct Complaint Case Number 00062518 on 10/4/2023Complaint
The purpose of the inspection was to conduct complaint case number 00062518 on 10/4/2023. A full inspection was not conducted at this time. Compliance Officer: David Ramos The ratios observed were: Infants: 2:6 1's: 1:6 2's: 1:5; 1:8; 1:7 3's: 1:7 4's: 1:12 ; 0:1 School-age: 2:6 There were 2 staff members interviewed during this investigation. Documentation observed was: daily rosters. Upon completion of the complaint investigation, it was determined from observations, in