Prodigy Learning Center
Data last updated · May 2026
Quality Indicators
See Methodology →- Overall QualityCombines daily care quality (interactions, learning, environment) with structural features like staff-to-child ratios and teacher qualifications.5 / 5
- Process QualityThe quality of daily care — caregiver-child interactions, learning activities, and the emotional climate. Drawn from the state QRIS rating, accreditations, and Head Start CLASS observations.Not Available
- Structural QualityMeasurable features like staff-to-child ratios, group sizes, license status, and teacher qualifications. Provider-level data when available; otherwise the state regulatory baseline.5 / 5
Why this rating
This daycare earned 5 out of 5 stars overall. Structural quality reflects a license in good standing. The structural rating also includes Arizona's licensing baseline — what every licensed daycare in the state must meet. Arizona caps infant ratios at 1:5, toddler ratios at 1:6, and preschool ratios at 1:15. Lead teachers must hold a High School Diploma. Teachers must complete 18 hours of annual training. No objective process measures (e.g., state quality rating or national accreditation) are available for this daycare. The overall rating reflects structural features only.
Quality Recognitions & Accreditations
- Accreditations
- National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)Not Accredited
- National Accreditation Commission (NAC)Not Accredited
- National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA)Not Accredited
- National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)Not Accredited
Facility Info
- Facility type
- Group Child Care Home
- Age groups served
- Not Available
- Licensed capacity
- 10
- Teacher-child ratios & group sizesState Minimum Displayed
Age Max ratio Max group Infants 1:5 Not Regulated Toddlers 1:6 Not Regulated Preschool 1:15 Not Regulated
Teacher Credentials
- Lead teacher credentialState Minimum Displayed
- High School Diploma
Inspection History
Across 6 inspections since 2023, the issues cited most often were Staff Qualifications & Background Checks (3) and Licensing & Administrative Compliance (3). None of the 6 findings were critical.
See All 6 Inspection Visits
Feb 10, 20261 Finding1 Important
- There Were No Deficiencies Observed at the Time of the Mid-Year Inspection Conducted on 2/10/2026, and Are Subject To…Midyear
There were no deficiencies observed at the time of the Mid-Year inspection conducted on 2/10/2026, and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. The fingerprint clearance cards for 2 of 2 staff/household members whose files were reviewed were verified to be valid through the DPS website at the time of the inspection.
Aug 26, 20251 Finding1 Important
- The Following Deficiency Was Observed at the Time of the Attempted Compliance Inspection Conducted on 8/26/2025 and Are…Compliance (Annual)
The following deficiency was observed at the time of the attempted Compliance Inspection conducted on 8/26/2025 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. The Compliance Inspection was unable to be conducted on 8/26/2025 due to facility closure.
Feb 25, 20251 Finding1 Important
- There Were No Deficiencies Observed at the Time of the Mid-Year Inspection Conducted on 2/25/2025, and Are Subject To…Midyear
There were no deficiencies observed at the time of the Mid-Year inspection conducted on 2/25/2025, and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. The fingerprint clearance cards for 2 of 2 staff/household members whose files were reviewed were verified to be valid through the DPS website at the time of the inspection.
Aug 28, 20241 Finding1 Important
- There Were No Deficiencies Observed at the Time of the Compliance Inspection Conducted on 8/28/2024, and Are Subject To…Compliance (Annual)
There were no deficiencies observed at the time of the Compliance inspection conducted on 8/28/2024, and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. The fingerprint clearance cards for 2 of 2 staff were verified to be valid through the DPS website at the time of the inspection. Compliance Officer #1: Elizabeth Enriquez Compliance Officer #2: Celeste Angulo
Feb 28, 20241 Finding1 Important
- There Were No Deficiencies Observed at the Time of the Mid-Year Inspection Conducted on 2/28/2024, and Are Subject To…Midyear
There were no deficiencies observed at the time of the Mid-Year inspection conducted on 2/28/2024, and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. The fingerprint clearance cards for 2 of 2 staff were verified to be valid through the DPS website at the time of the inspection. Compliance Officer: Elizabeth Enriquez
Aug 31, 20231 Finding1 Important
- There Were No Deficiencies at the Time of the Compliance Inspection Conducted on 8/31/2023Compliance (Annual)
There were no deficiencies at the time of the Compliance Inspection conducted on 8/31/2023. The Emergency Disaster Contact form was completed at the time of the inspection. The Empower Self-Evaluation was completed at the time of the inspection. The fingerprint clearance cards for 2 of 2 staff members were verified to be valid through the DPS website at the time of inspection. During the exit interview, the following items were discussed but are not limited to: *Ensure toxic substan