The Farmhouse Daycare Co.
Data last updated · May 2026
Quality Indicators
See Methodology →- Overall QualityCombines daily care quality (interactions, learning, environment) with structural features like staff-to-child ratios and teacher qualifications.5 / 5
- Process QualityThe quality of daily care — caregiver-child interactions, learning activities, and the emotional climate. Drawn from the state QRIS rating, accreditations, and Head Start CLASS observations.Not Available
- Structural QualityMeasurable features like staff-to-child ratios, group sizes, license status, and teacher qualifications. Provider-level data when available; otherwise the state regulatory baseline.5 / 5
Why this rating
This daycare earned 5 out of 5 stars overall. Structural quality reflects a license in good standing. The structural rating also includes Arizona's licensing baseline — what every licensed daycare in the state must meet. Arizona caps infant ratios at 1:5, toddler ratios at 1:6, and preschool ratios at 1:15. Lead teachers must hold a High School Diploma. Teachers must complete 18 hours of annual training. No objective process measures (e.g., state quality rating or national accreditation) are available for this daycare. The overall rating reflects structural features only.
Quality Recognitions & Accreditations
- Accreditations
- National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)Not Accredited
- National Accreditation Commission (NAC)Not Accredited
- National Early Childhood Program Accreditation (NECPA)Not Accredited
- National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)Not Accredited
Facility Info
- Facility type
- Child Care Center
- Age groups served
- Toddlers, Preschool
- Licensed capacity
- 128
- Teacher-child ratios & group sizesState Minimum Displayed
Age Max ratio Max group Toddlers 1:6 Not Regulated Preschool 1:15 Not Regulated
Teacher Credentials
- Lead teacher credentialState Minimum Displayed
- High School Diploma
Inspection History
Across 9 inspections since 2023, the issues cited most often were Licensing & Administrative Compliance (8) and Staff Qualifications & Background Checks (1). None of the 9 findings were critical.
See All 9 Inspection Visits
Nov 5, 20251 Finding1 Important
- The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of the Compliance Inspection Conducted on 11/5/2025 and Are…Compliance (Annual)
The following deficiencies were observed at the time of the Compliance Inspection conducted on 11/5/2025 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. Please submit the Plan of Corrections via the LMS portal within 10 days of receipt of the Statement of Deficiencies. The Emergency Disaster Contact form was completed at the time of the inspection. The Empower Self-Evaluation was emailed to the director. The Notice of Inspection Rights was provided to the licensee at the time
Jul 24, 20251 Finding1 Important
- The Purpose of the Inspection Was to Conduct Complaint Investigation #00137039Complaint
The purpose of the inspection was to conduct Complaint investigation #00137039. A full inspection was not conducted at this time. The following deficiency was observed at the time of complaint #00137039 investigation conducted on 7/24/2025 and is subject to changes pending programmatic review. Please submit the Written Plan of Corrections via the LMS portal within 10 days of receipt of the Statement of Deficiencies. Ratios observed were: Infants: 1:5 1-year-old children: 2:8 2
Nov 7, 20241 Finding1 Important
- The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of the Compliance Inspection Conducted on 11/07/2024 and Are…Compliance (Annual)
The following deficiencies were observed at the time of the Compliance Inspection conducted on 11/07/2024 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. Please submit the Plan of Corrections via the LMS portal within 10 days of receipt of the Statement of Deficiencies. The Emergency Disaster Contact form was completed at the time of the inspection. The Empower Self-Evaluation was emailed at the time of the inspection. The DES Contact form was completed at the time of the ins
Oct 18, 20241 Finding1 Important
- The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of Complaints 00091537 and 00091557 Investigation Conducted On…Complaint
The following deficiencies were observed at the time of Complaints 00091537 and 00091557 investigation conducted on 10/18/24 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. Telephone calls were made to the Complainants on 10/18/24 Compliance Officer # 1: Brian Howell Compliance Officer # 2: Archana Navin The Written Document of Corrections is due within 10 days A complete inspection of the facility was not conducted. The following classroom ratios were observed: Ones: 3:
Aug 28, 20241 Finding1 Important
- The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of the Complaint Investigation (Case# 88954) Conducted On…Complaint
The following deficiencies were observed at the time of the Complaint investigation (Case# 88954) conducted on 08/28/2024 and are subject to change pending programmatic review. The investigation was completed on 08/28/2024. Compliance Officer (CO) #1: Pat Morgan-Martinez Compliance Officer (CO) #2: Monika Jones A full inspection was not conducted at this time. The Complainant was contacted on 08/27/2024. Please submit the Written Documentation of Corrections via the Licensing porta
Nov 8, 20231 Finding1 Important
- The Following Deficiencies Were Observed at the Time of the Compliance Inspection Conducted on 11/08/2023 and Are…Compliance (Annual)
The following deficiencies were observed at the time of the Compliance Inspection conducted on 11/08/2023 and are subject to changes pending programmatic review. Please submit the Plan of Corrections via the LMS portal within 10 days of receipt of the Statement of Deficiencies. The fingerprint clearance cards for 4 of the 4 staff members were verified to be valid through the DPS website at the time of the inspection. During the exit interview, the following items were discussed but are
Oct 11, 20231 Finding1 Important
- The Purpose of the Inspection Was to Conduct a Complaint InvestigationComplaint
The purpose of the inspection was to conduct a complaint investigation. A full inspection was not conducted at this time. Ratios observed were: 1-year-old children 2:9 *2-year-old children 1:11 3-year-old children 2:22 4 & 5-year old children 1:15 There was 1 staff interviewed during this investigation. Others interviewed: Facility Director. Documentation observed was a video clip. Upon completion of compliant #00064744, it was determined from video review and interviews, th
Jul 10, 20231 Finding1 Important
- The Purpose of the Inspection Was to Conduct Complaint Case Numbers 00060268 and 00060815 on 7/10/2023Complaint
The purpose of the inspection was to conduct complaint case numbers 00060268 and 00060815 on 7/10/2023. A full inspection was not conducted at this time. Compliance Officer #1: David Ramos Compliance Officer #2: Sherri Pavlisick The ratios observed were: 1's: 1:9; 1:10 2's: 1:8 3's-4's: 1:21; 2:24 There were 7 staff members interviewed during this investigation onsite. Others interviewed: the two complainants by phone on 7/7/2023. There was 1 staff file reviewed during this i
Jun 16, 20231 Finding1 Important
- The Purpose of the Inspection Was to Conduct a Complaint InvestigationComplaint
The purpose of the inspection was to conduct a complaint investigation. A full inspection was not conducted at this time. Ratios observed were: 1-year-old children: 3:12 2-year-old children: 2:7 3-year-old children: 2:15 4- year-old children: 1:13 There were 3 staff were interviewed during this investigation. The Compliance Officer attempted to contact the complainant via telephone on 3/30/2022 and 3/31/2022, however, was unable to speak to the complainant. Documentation